‘Kids Online Safety Act’ is a Trojan Horse For Digital Censorship.::Washington, D.C. - This week, a bipartisan cohort of US Senators unveiled a new version of the Kids Online Safety Act, a bill that aims to impose various restrictions and requirements on tech

  • tempest@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Everytime I read a bill with a moniker like this I’m immediately sceptical

  • oDDmON@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    When they say, “It’s for the children”, you can rest assured, it’s not.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    The consumer choice center is a Washington/ Brussels think tank and lobbying group. They are passionate about free markets and consumer choice and oppose taxes and regulations on things like petroleum products, tobacco, and sugary/fatty foods.

    I don’t have an opinion on the “Kids” act, just consider the source.

  • KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I love the part of this article where it explains why this may be the case instead of just quoting random people.

  • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    The bill is garbage, but it cracks me up that they think this part is a bad thing:

    The bill seeks to … limit developers’ inclusion of personalized recommendation systems, notifications, appearance-altering filters, and in-game purchases for apps used by minors.

    Every item on that list has been abused by web/app developers in ways that exploit and/or negatively affect the brains of developing children.

    • ArbiterXero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Simpsons did it best….

      …. Won’t someone pleeeease think of the children!

      Tale as old as time (yes I know your answer was /sarcastic)