• Zyratoxx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    To me, a european, those urban areas packed with the same house over and over again always seem so depressing and boring. Is there any variety or does it look like this for kilometers miles?

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          nah, HOAs should have legally regulated limits on what they can and cannot do, sweden has HOAs too but basically all they do is pool together money to pay for infrastructure in the neighbourhood.

          like, i for one quite like having paved roads and functional pipes, but i guess you do you.

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            like, i for one quite like having paved roads and functional pipes, but i guess you do you.

            Do non HOA homes not have paved roads and working pipes?

            • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              There are no such areas, i’m not sure how you envision common infrastructure being maintained without an organization owning it?

              Or do you just envision the municipality being in charge of maintaining your street’s piping? Have fun waiting half a year for them to get to it when it breaks.

              • shottymcb@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                Or do you just envision the municipality being in charge of maintaining your street’s piping?

                That’s how my neighborhood works.

                Have fun waiting half a year for them to get to it when it breaks.

                They’re usually there within an hour if that happens.

    • kautau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I agree, and these houses look way too small and overpriced for a comfortable family setting, but stating that identical homes packed next to each other is purely an American thing is disingenuous. It’s a byproduct of capitalism, which supersedes national borders

      • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        In Chicago there is one block just north of Wrigley Field that was a demo for a planned community decades ago. Each of the 10 or so connected houses on one side of the street are all different. The opposite side of the street is identical, but mirrored. That means the northernmost house on the west side of the street is identical to the southernmost house on the east side of the street. The effect is that it looks like a very unique and natural community in spite of being completely planned and regimented.

        • kautau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s a better approach I think. It’s economically viable to make similar houses, but aesthetically and psychologically pleasing for houses to be different and unique, even if it’s just a variation per house on a street and not every street itself

    • scoobford@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Generally it is each subdivision, but it can be larger groups of homes like that.

      They are depressing, but people buy them because they’re generally new construction and represent good value. You get over it if it saves you enough $$$.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’ve yet to go into any new construction that wasn’t shit compared to the 100 year old house I grew up in. That place was rock solid. The only problem with it was a roof leak that was actually from the extension my parents had done on the 2nd floor (aka new construction). By comparison every time I go visit their new house they’ve uncovered some new shoddy workmanship from the shit builders that inly focus on cranking out houses as fast and cheap as possible. I hate so much that they sold their old place for this garbage I’m going to have to fix when I inherit it.

        • scoobford@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I agree, old homes have hella survivorship bias. But, you are playing roulette that nothing with fail immediately. The advantage of new construction is that you don’t have to worrru about any stupid retrofits and that you know nothing will break for at least a little bit.

          • Clasm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Or worry about all of the asbestos, lead, and formaldehyde -laced building materials that were all of the rage in previous decades.

            • shottymcb@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I think Formaldehyde is a bigger problem in new construction than old. Asbestos and lead are harder to deal with though. Formaldehyde just needs ventilation and a few years of offgassing.

  • Thrashy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    It’s like a suburban tract home developer with a case of brain worms tried to build townhomes based solely on a verbal description he got from space alien visiting Brooklyn for the first time, relayed over a cell phone with one bar of reception.

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I love that Americans would still rather have crappy rectangles of lawn that they never use for anything than build up to the edge of the plot and have more rooms. Those plots are probably slightly bigger than that of my three bedroom terrace house.

  • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    What a poor use of land and space for housing. Why not increase density with at a minimum a duplex or triplex? This is ridiculous.

    • eek2121@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      A lot of people don’t want to share walls.

      “Hey uh, I have 3 loud kids and a wife who is loud during sex. Wanna be my neighbor?”

    • spicy pancake@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I’ve lived in several 1-toilet apartments in my life and am now a firm believer that all 1-toilet tenants have a god-given right to access to a backup toilet (such as in a laundry room or rec room on the apartment complex’s campus)

      a toilet is a VERY unfun thing to not have a backup of and suddenly it’s not working

  • DharkStare@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    The houses are so close together and have so little yard I don’t see why they didn’t just turn them into townhouses.

  • z00s@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why would you need two bathrooms if you’ve only got one bedroom??