eurekaphoenix@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoFacebook's "Threads" has lost more than half of its userswww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square74fedilinkarrow-up1672arrow-down142
arrow-up1630arrow-down1external-linkFacebook's "Threads" has lost more than half of its userswww.bbc.comeurekaphoenix@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square74fedilink
minus-squarejtk@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·11 months agoA different half than the half lost weeks ago?
minus-squareCabrio@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-211 months agoAnother half. Threads use is down to about 6 minutes a day — plummeting from 21 minutes when it first launched. (Per user/per day) Edit: For perspective, Twitter is at 34 mins, Facebook at 30 mins.
minus-squaresmeeps@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·11 months agoI can see that, before I uninstalled it, it barely took 2 minute to open it and see that still only about 3 of the people I followed on Twitter are now on it, and my feed is still full of celebrity nonsense rather than anything interesting.
minus-squareParadox@lemdro.idlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 months agoThreads is enacting Zeno’s dichotomy in real time, but with users instead of distances
A different half than the half lost weeks ago?
Another half.
Threads use is down to about 6 minutes a day — plummeting from 21 minutes when it first launched. (Per user/per day)
Edit: For perspective, Twitter is at 34 mins, Facebook at 30 mins.
I can see that, before I uninstalled it, it barely took 2 minute to open it and see that still only about 3 of the people I followed on Twitter are now on it, and my feed is still full of celebrity nonsense rather than anything interesting.
Threads is enacting Zeno’s dichotomy in real time, but with users instead of distances