• kakes@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t know much about American laws, and I strongly believe that basic housing should not be for-profit.

    With those caveats, if a house is empty for such a long time that squatters can claim it (7-20 years according to Google), then I think it’s not only okay to claim residence there, I think it’s the morally correct thing to do.

    Obviously, there are exceptions to anything, but generally speaking, it sounds like society could use more of this.

      • kakes@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        On the other hand, I can’t imagine they’ve only been “vacant” for 6 months or something.

        Again, I’m far from an expert on American law - much less on a state-by-state basis, but I have to think you’d need to live there for quite some time for it to count for squatters rights.

        • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          In these situations 6 months is exactly what I’d imagine. Where I live I can’t imagine any house staying vacant for 6 months. It costs more to rent a house here than it does to buy one. My mortgage payment is $1400/month, but I could rent my house for over $3k a month. it’s ridiculous.