I’ve been using this search engine and I have to say I’m absolutely in love with it.

Search results are great, Google level even. Can’t tell you how happy I am after trying multiple privacy oriented engines and always feeling underwhelmed with them.

Have you tried it? What are your thoughts on it?

  • Sendbeer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Personally I love it. Being able to boost results from some sites while depriotizing or even banning others has been real helpful. Not having unrelated “sponsored” content cluttering up the results is certainly nice as well. The results themselves feel like Google from ten years ago, relevant and on point.

  • LWD@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I stumbled onto some comments about Kagi angling to become an AI-first search engine that actually brags about putting you in a filter bubble. From Kagi’s manifesto:

    In the future, instead of everyone sharing the same search engine, you’ll have your completely individual, personalized Mike or Julia or Jarvis - the AI. Instead of being scared to share information with it, you will volunteer your data, knowing its incentives align with yours.

    One YouTube video suggests a grim future: “Everybody has a feed uniquely tailored to them. Nobody talks about their favorite YouTubers anymore, because everybody watches different content farms. All the real creators quit a long time ago.”

    Food for thought. I don’t like the idea of these filter bubbles.


    ETA: I didn’t realize it at the time but they also promise data collection for

    • Political echo chambers: “But there will also be search companions with different abilities… You could customize an AI to be conservative or liberal”
    • Corporate brand loyalty: “Ask it for a good coffee maker, and it’ll recommend choices within your budget from your favorite brands”

    If you’re looking for an open source search engine that’s building its own data set, one exists (and it’s totally open source and free).

    https://stract.com/

    If you’re looking for something that collates other engines’ contents, SearXNG is also open source and free.

    https://searx.space

    Kagi isn’t really unique in any way here; their most unique quality appears to be linking your searches to an account, requesting money, and promising not to sell your data at a later date.

    • Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      … Okay, I just tried Stract, and its results are… Mostly not helpful.

      My understanding is that Kagi makes an effort to tell you how they anonymize your search so they can’t tie it back to your account afterwards, whereas Searx is more dependent solely on the goodwill of whoever is hosting the instance. Both are good faith dependent in the end, but one has a profit motive for keeping that faith.

      Edit: I hope Stract gets there and takes off one day, but today doesn’t seem to be that day for me.

      • sudneo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        The privacy policy is also a legally binding document, not just a promise that the company does. If they are found violating it, the GDPR fines are going to hurt and they would lose the customer base in a blink. Their privacy policy right now is exemplary, I am one of those who read policies before using a product and kagi’s is literally the best I have seen: clear, detailed, specific and most importantly, good from the privacy perspective.

    • Scolding7300@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      There’s some tradeoff here, keep garbage out and relevant results in. Definitely want to stay connected with others and share knowledge (such as websites that provide quality info)

  • denast@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Been using is for several months. Definitely VERY overpriced (I’d say $3-4/mo for a search engine would be fine, not $10), but the results are great, and I love the quick answer feature. It quickly summarizes info from top results, helped me a lot in college, where sometimes your brain is melting and you want the answer NOW.

  • Atemu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I was introduced to it by an IRL friend of mine very early on and was very sceptical. I then tried it many months later and what actually convinced me most are its “advanced” features. They’re features that should obviously be in any search engine but since there’s been practically 0 innovation in this space in the past decade or so, this is very refreshing.

    The results being on par with Google at the worst also helps.

    Pretty much everything about it is really great. The only thing that’s not great is that you’re required to identify yourself with every search. I’m not aware of any alternative for a paid search engine though. They claim to not log or otherwise abuse your PII and it’s believable but there’s still a risk.
    I guess the price is also kinda high but it’s justified AFAICT.

    Btw: !kagi@lemmy.ml.

  • kevincox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I am currently subscribed and it is definitely a step up from other engines I have tried. The main feature is just that it seems to somewhat cut back the general blogspam and SEO fluff. It isn’t perfect but whenever I do compare it to Google, Brave or Duck Duck Go it seems to be ahead, or in rare cases similar.

    The ability to lower/block sites is also quite nice. I also have a few raised sites, but that is really a minor improvement compared to blocking crap like Quora and Pintrest.

    That being said the small plan is a pretty small number of searches so I need to pay for the unlimited plan which is quite expensive. I currently think it is worth it but it is definitely borderline value, not a slam-dunk decision.

    I also have concerns about them focusing on things I don’t care about. Lots of AI features and a browser. I don’t want any of that, just focus on search, there is still lots of room for improvement, even if they are currently leading the pack.

    • Scolding7300@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Not saying you’re wrong, want to share my perspective: I agree with the AI, the quick answer saves me a ton of time by adding source links where I always click on to verify the answer (quicker than going through search results when I don’t know the terminology).

      As to the browser - not really sure why they’re pushing for their own, isn’t FF good enough?

      • kevincox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, the AI I am lukewarm on. I’m fine having them experiment, and it does seem that they are using it tastefully. It is something that I can see improving the experience in the future even if I feel it has little to no benefit to me now.

        But yes, the browser just seems like a distraction.

  • rinze@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I created an account a few months ago but I’ve barely used it. DDG provides pretty much everything I search for. This might be because I don’t typically do very “esoteric” searches, but for now I don’t see the need for a paid service. Most of the times, tweaking the query so that it looks for a specific source is good enough.

    I’d love if DDG had a system to remove entire domains entirely from the results, though.

  • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think it’s great. It’s the only search engine where I don’t find myself going back the Google every now and then. I’d say the results are actually a lot better than what Google offers. Being able to rank websites higher or lower (or even pin them or block them entirely) is great, and as it’s saved to your account, it’s basically synced across devices.

    It’s $10/month for unlimited searches. I tried their limited $5 plan first, but found myself thinking “do I really need to search this?” way too often to try and stay under the 200 (back then I think, now it’s 300) search limit.

    Their privacy model is mostly based on you trusting them that they don’t keep your search history for longer or any other purposes than stated (if turned on), but their business model is clearly based on subscriptions, so it should be fine unless they get greedy.

    • Lemmchen@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      You can not enable the “feature” to keep search history. The slider stays disabled when you try.

      • narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        True, it’s even disabled by default. But you still have to trust them that they really don’t store your history.

  • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s ridiculously expensive. It’s not private if you have to link your searches to a paid account and none of those payment providers are private. They don’t seem to have open sourced any of their key functionality, meaning you have to trust them to not be collecting your activity data.

    I spent a long time getting rid of software and using services that I either no longer trusted or was unable to make an informed choice due to their lack of open source code and I’m not going to take a retrograde step now. And that’s without the issue with their choice (a continued choice I believe) to use Brave results, a company I’m personally not prepared to support.

    • Research8165@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Current Kagi user paying for it privately. They offer top ups to your account with crypto. I do xmr -> btc to top up my account. Also signed up with an alias email.

    • PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      If they don’t cache your search history to your identity, which they claim they don’t, then I’m not sure why that’s a problem.

      • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Because claiming they don’t is not the same as being able to verify they don’t by making their code open source.

          • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Deciding to trust a provider - any provider - isn’t just any one thing. So, the most basic step to me is all the relevant code being open source. The next step is getting their infrastructure audited. The step after that is seeing what happens if they get court ordered to provide data.

            They do none of that and I’m just too cynical to accept ‘trust me bro’ as a convincing sales tactic.

            • sudneo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 months ago

              They had a security audit, they have a canary on their website, they have a privacy policy which is legally binding, and they have a business incentive.

              If you so much suspect that they do collect searches and associate them with accounts (something which they claim they don’t do), you can make a report to the relevant data protection authority, which then can audit them.

              As someone else also commented, you can use an alias email and pay in crypto if you really wish to not associate your account with your searches. Just be advised that between IP addresses and browser fingerprinting it might always be possible to associate your searches together (even if not to you as an individual with name and surname), and this is something that big CDNs like cloudflare or imperva also provide for you. So you still rely in most cases on what the company says and what their business model is to determine whether you trust them or not.

              So far kagi has both a good policy (great policy actually) and a business model that doesn’t suggest any interest for them to illegally collect data to sell them.

              • Leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                I don’t suspect or accuse them of anything. Quite the reverse - what I’m saying is that without things like open source code, privacy audits etc, we’re being asked to take their word for it all. They might well be the most privacy respecting company ever and they equally might not be. If you’re happy to take their word for it, that’s entirely your call. I’m not trying to change anyone’s mind, I’m just answering OP’s question with my own opinion.

                • sudneo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  And I am saying that there are tools to increase this trust.

                  I also want to stress that you have no tools really to verify. Open source code is useless, audits are also partially useless. I have done audits myself (as the tech contact for the audited party) and the reality is that they are extremely easy to game and anyway are just point in time snapshots. There is nothing that impedes the company tomorrow to deploy a change that invalidates what was audited. The biggest tools we have are legal protection (I mean, most companies that collect all kind of data disclose that they do nowadays) and economic incentive. Kagi seems to provide good reason to trust them from both these angles.

                  Obviously, if that’s not enough for you, fair enough, but if you are considering a company to be intentionally malicious or deceptive, then even the guarantees you suggest do not guarantee anything, so at this point I really wonder if or how you trust anybody, starting from your ISP, your DNS provider, your browser etc.

  • BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I love it. Personally I don’t think it is too expensive, though I am probably a power user of search engines, as I need it a lot while programming all sorts of stuff… So maybe it is just me saying its worth the money, because I use it a lot

    • Scolding7300@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      To me 100$/y seems a little much compared to Proton Unlimited and the amount of features there. Perhaps it’s like that due to their size and AI features

      • BentiGorlich@gehirneimer.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Running a search engine is just a lot more expensive than running a VPN and email service. The amount of data and processing power needed to have a useful search index is just so much higher

    • sudneo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      https://kagi.com/privacy

      Kagi only stores the information about the client that you explicitly provide by using your account, as laid out in our interface. This includes:

      Your email to facilitate account access and support contact (ex: password reset) Your account settings (ex: theme, search region, selected language)

      And nothing else.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m so glad that all companies always follow there privacy policy.

        Seriously though even if they don’t track you an adversary could compromise them

        • sudneo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          They don’t, but a company built on that premise (private search) that does otherwise would be playing with fire. It caters to users that specifically look for that. I would quit in an instant if that would be the case, for example.

          Seriously though even if they don’t track you an adversary could compromise them

          This is true about pretty much anything. Unless you host and write the code yourself, this is a risk. It is a risk with searXNG (malicious instance, malicious PR/code change that gets approved etc.), with email providers, with DNS providers, etc.

          What solution you propose to this, that can actually scale?

  • Asudox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I just started paying the unlimited plan. I like the search results and the URL replacement setting. I can redirect YouTube videos to piped and Reddit to the old one so my VPN doesn’t get blocked. The lenses are also top notch.

  • nailoC5@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    startpage is already on google level and the defaults of some searxng instances are better the google results

    • noodlejetski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      startpage is already on google level

      probably because it literally proxies Google’s search results.

    • targetx@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      At the risk of sounding incredibly naive, what kind of western censorship are you talking about? I’ve never noticed that as an issue with either Google, DDG or kagi.