• Neato@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    https://www.westerndigital.com/products/mp3-players/sandisk-clip-sport-go?sku=SDMX30-016G-G46B

    $50.

    Edit: What’s the point of open sourcing this product? It’s an MP3 player. How does it utilize wifi? Does it run apps? Can it access a file server to download new media? The video and article doesn’t go into that at all. BT is nice but Sandisk $50 clip players have had that for a long time.

    This seems like 5x the price for a dev product.

    • lukstru@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      What’s the point of open sourcing this product?

      Some people just like to have the possibility to change and completely own their stuff. Some people actually do change firmware or hardware components. I’d say it’s mostly for tech enthusiasts and tinkerers.

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s weird to ask “what the point of open sourcing this product”, do you ask what the point of keeping the source closed is?

      • Neato@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        What benefits do you get from this device being open source? It’s not like a dumb mp3 player is stealing your data. Can it do anything traditional players can’t?

        • echo64@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          what benefits do you get from that painting being blue? what benefits do you get from eating an orange vs an banana? explain yourself.

          • Neato@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            This might be the more inane and useless response I’ve seen on Lemmy. You can’t answer the simple question so you throw out a complete change of topic. Pathetic.

        • ElderWendigo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Making a lower quality copy of a file to save a minimal amount of space is a waste of my time. Besides 2TB is enough space for over 7,000 hours of basic 44.1kHz 16-bit FLAC listening.

          Edit: That’s what I get for using a random online calculator. Based on the 39,354 FLAC files I have (of various encoding qualities), totalling 1.19516 terabytes and about 9686530 seconds of audio, I can expect a 2TB SD card to fit somewhere around 4,444 hours of FLAC audio. That still seems like enough.

          • potustheplant@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Totally. Dropping a folder to fre:ac and clicking 2 buttons takes an enormous amount of time.

            Also, 7000 hours of FLAC 16/44.1 is about 4.44 TB so your math is pretty off.