There are about 16.3 million homes in the country. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp. last year calculated that, for prices to moderate, 5.8 million more are needed over the next decade – that’s 3.5 million on top of the 2.3 million that would otherwise be built. Look at those numbers and wonder why the Prime Minister held a press conference for 214 homes. Look at those numbers and consider the national housing strategy’s modest impact, 107,519 homes, so far.

  • sciawp@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I love when the news tries to blame Trudeau for provincial issues instead of, y’know, the provincial leaders

    • Powerpoint@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The federal government could absolutely help but you are correct this is primarily a provincial responsibility and the province has all the tools to fix this but they choose not to. There’s too many domestic speculators in power that have a lot to lose.

    • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t buy this idea. The feds have all sorts of things they can do. Can they solve the crises alone? Of course not. But they can sure as hell help.

      Let’s start with capital gains on the sale of a home…

      • Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        What tools do they really have, other than money?

        Really, what tools do the federal government have that can be used, and have effect, in local legislation?

        • michaelmelanson@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          They have the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), the same people who currently provide mortgage insurance. In their original 1945 mandate, they were responsible for building housing for returning war veterans, as well as loans to purchase them. It was only later, in the 1980s, that the building part was dropped and they took up their current role.

          So the federal government has the option of returning the CMHC to its original mandate.

        • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Like I said in the comment they could change capital gains exclusion on a primary residence. Add taxes for homes past your primary home (like Singapore). They could stop with the RRSP withdrawals for home buyers, kill the first time home buyers savings account, ban foreign buyers without all the loop holes, add legislation around cooperate ownership etc.

          Other countries are doing things at the federal level. For some reason our Feda only institute programs that actively make things worse.

          • EhForumUser@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Other countries are doing things at the federal level.

            Of course, other counties often have it easier there. For instance, looking to our neighbours to the south, their federal government reigns supreme. It can push policy down on the states. That is not the case in Canada. The provinces are of the highest power.

            For some reason our Feda only institute programs that actively make things worse.

            Well, yes, trying to make the provinces look bad is kind of the federal government’s thing. Presumably it is because it wants to convince the public that it needs that supremacy, so that one day it can take it.

    • Sloogs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The cost of living and housing crises are happening across the entire country so I would say, yes, it very much does become a question of federal policy at that point and existing federal mandates (immigration) are one of the biggest sources of high demand putting stress on housing.

      Even if that federal policy is working with provinces to figure their shit out on housing.

    • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You don’t think the federal government has any responsibility for the housing crisis?

      • Powerpoint@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Both levels of government are responsible. Pretending anything otherwise is ignorant. The provinces have the majority of tools to solve this by taxing domestic speculators high amounts to force them to stop hoarding stock and in provinces like Ontario uploading public housing to the province as municipalities can’t generate the revenue required to pay for it.

      • joshhsoj1902@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t believe the federal government can fix the problem if the provincial governments don’t want help.

        Considering the federal government is taking the brunt of the provincial government failures it’s not really surprising the provinces aren’t rushing to take action.