I asked one question and you all are dogpiling me when you could have just scrolled right past. Now you can fuck right off. Its not unreasonable that somebody can’t play a goddamn video.

Is there a transcript? I’m not watching a video. This is a discussion board. Why are you being hostile to questions?

There’s no way that’s a real Nintendo ad.

Lmao wtf

What changes did they make?

Dude, rain water is full of pollutants too. 😂

I bought this game already. It still works. Why should I buy it again?

Says the person whose only contribution to the thread is insulting others. Fuck off.

In no sense of the word would anyone ever say he created Alice. It could be called an interpretation, not quite an adaptation, but probably just based on characters by Lewis Carroll.

Lmao 😂

Literally didn’t say that. Thanks for that useless input.

I know I get that, its just that Alice is both the name of the game and the name of the character, one of which he created and the other he didn’t. There’s not a great way to phrase it, but it makes it sound like he created the character Alice, which he did not.

Calling American McGee “Alice creator” with no additional context is a bit absurd.

My point is if something is impossible to do, that doesn’t make it difficult. It makes it impossible. Those are two different things.

Literally not at all what I said. Put that shit back in your ass where it belongs.

That law was added when guns were so imprecise it was difficult to hit the broadside of a barn from inside the barn.

How is that not blatantly false? Piss off troll.

And millions of people enjoy trash mobile games that throw microtransactions at you every couple of minutes. Popularity is not an indicator of quality.

They weren’t idiots either. They weren’t stupid enough to think technology was static and would never improve, firearms technology was literally improving during their lifetime. They wrote the constitution the way they did deliberately. The constitution was meant to be a living document, true, but the only reason to change that amendment is, simply put, fascism.

That law was added when guns were so imprecise it was difficult to hit the broadside of a barn from inside the barn.

That’s blatantly false. Timothy Murphy killed a British officer during the Revolutionary War at a distance of 300-400 yards. They absolutely had the capability of precise marksmanship at the time the constitution was written. Repeating rifles were not a foreign concept either. They weren’t common yet, but there was no reason for them to believe the technology wouldn’t be improved.

No, you are. Literally read the goddamn title of the thread.