In real debates, you logically disprove the other person while proving your own point
In real debates, you logically disprove the other person while proving your own point
Yeah, but everything else is more annoying. 1+e^i(0.5τ)=0 just doesn’t hit the same
The joke is just as inaccurate before being pointed out, he’s an enjoyment ruiner
Couldn’t be a king as it would have already been stalemate the previous turn otherwise
Technically it’s the only kind of objective correct. Other subjective types also exist (such as morally).
I believe it refers to the desire to suddenly start running about in a senseless and thoughtless manner
https://www.spring.org.uk/2023/01/intrinsic-motivation.php
Turns out people are actually more productive if you don’t force them to do it in order to live.
If they’re using “communism” to control the people, then they’re not really using communism
It’s that we don’t like the company google probably. But also it could be a combination of the factors you listed.
In an immediately seen sense, the US is not really committing a genocide. However, the corporations that control the US through lobbying and bribes and whatever else are literally destroying the planet past the point where humans can survive. So, while before we all burn your living conditions might be better, the country is working towards a far greater death count.
Ironically, Russia doesn’t even follow communist ideals. They are communist in name only.
Tis the difference betwixt private and personal property, we don’t want your toothbrush but your toothbrush factory however…