Explain to me why shareholders, who do exactly 0 work and sit on their asses all day, should receive free money?

Why are people allowed to be parasites on society just because they have money?

Far-right, aren’t white supremacists?

Lol, what dimension are you from?

Rage with the machine

Show me an equivalent to Active Directory on Linux.

And no, allowing users to manage their machine themselves will break their entire computer and every server they can access. Most users never even read a warning if they can just click “OK”.

The problem is that the second option also requires you to go to work in a tuxedo.

Only a small niche of companies allow you to not work in a tuxedo.

So complaining about tuxedos at a job (in this universe) is just dumb.

It is more than functional for corporate, seeing how the majority of companies run entirely on it.

Memes are fine.

But this is straight up propaganda trying to disguise itself as a joke.

If I’d even encounter a dev like the one from the post. I’d laugh in his face and wish him good luck on finding a job that caters to their niche needs.

Nobody said outliers don’t exist.

What we are saying is that the majority (like 80% or something) are run entirely on Windows. No matter what the Linux fanboys want to believe.

You could have had some great points, but the fact that you use “microslop” unironically shows how much of a bias you have. Meaning your points might as well not exist.

You sound like an anti-vaxxer blaming everything wrong with their life on big pharma.

Every single business running Windows computers (which is about all of them) will have an Active Directory running on Windows.

Every company I worked for only ever had a handful of Linux servers and the majority of Windows servers.

Microsoft revenue generated $26.7 billion in one quarter from its Licensing, and even though a lot of it was through cloud, a lot of it also came through self hosted Windows servers.

You live in a bubble if you think nobody is using Windows server.

Seems like you didn’t learn anything about it, did you?

It is only hidden because too many non-programmers become hysterical whenever AI is mentioned.

In a rational world, it wouldn’t need to be hidden.

It is more nuance than rationality.

There are plenty of reasons to hate on AI. But in the end they are just tools to automate things. It depends entirely on how it is being used. With enough effort and most importantly checking the output, you can create things faster while still keeping the same quality as before.

Calling anything that even slightly touched an LLM “slop” and crawling in a fetus position while crying is a lot less rational. These people have no idea about the real world.

If you can’t understand the technology behind it, please refrain from calling other people names. It makes you look ignorant.

The EU is very privacy focused, as should be apparent with the post you are literally commenting on.

Your russian propaganda holds no power here. It didn’t work with chat control, and it won’t work with age verification either.

Yeah, tankies can’t handle it.

That “trojan horse” is nothing but a paper tiger since age control will be managed in a completely privacy-friendly way. It is a non-issue. So that is why it is being “overlooked”

The check will send nothing more than a yes/no verification, and no other forms of identification.

And the information will be managed by a governmental institute that already has all that information.

No, those things can be done in a completely private way.

There is no such thing as permanent laws. And for good reasons.

I wonder what all these anti-EU russian propaganda bots are going to use now to sow discontent against the EU… lol

*you think you never done

Your comments prove otherwise.

Maybe try some introspection instead of blaming your own problems on women? A handful of supposed women online are not representative of an entire gender. It is like blaming all men for the actions of a couple of incels.