One that’s in English.

No. Have you? There’s something concerning here if the spotlight in the conversation is on someone thinking there’s no difference between subjectively being unable to understand something and something being objectively difficult to understand.

Not what I was saying (and why be so objectivist when you don’t understand something).

Most things (as in anything you might be thinking of) is relevant to certain points (in the lecture), but most things (as in anything you might be thinking of) aren’t relevant to all the points (there are twelve points; most things are relevant to a few points).

Most things are relevant to certain points, but most things also aren’t relevant to all the points.

He mentions flaws in the way people do things which can then be applied to it.

At least they’re honest about it.

Star Talk is a serial hosted by Neil DeGrasse Tyson which is kind of like what Hank Green does. He has been talking more and more lately though about the science of humanity and communication. I didn’t know if I was allowed to give direct citations here, but it can be looked up.

As for “Leni”, well, that goes back a bit if you’ve been around for a while.

Star Talk is a serial hosted by Neil DeGrasse Tyson which is kind of like what Hank Green does. He has been talking more and more lately though about the science of humanity and communication. I didn’t know if I was allowed to give direct citations here, but it can be looked up.