The CIA and NSA always have bets running on what will happen, it’s a very accurate way to estimate actual outcome.

Gotta go half and half call them a fuckwit and explain how and why.

The boot is the best one, that bitch is so dippable.

Because Trump is super mad he wasn’t named Fred like his dad and always has been. What they do have in common is the middle name of a holy leader, with Fred his middle name was legit “Christ” and Donald it’s John the Baptist. His dead brother was Fred Christ as well but they gave him shit about caring about people until he drunk himself to death.

You’d be wrong there, they have police and they are in fact strict, the US marshal system does not fuck around.

Sorta. They’re pointing out the fact is the default is straight, if you want to scream it at people well that’ll cost you some money.

It’s dumb, super petty and ultimately inane as are most identity politics. I get the point to an extent but anything to either extreme gets a bit grating and irritating.

Fun stupid as opposed to what? Stern stupid?

You’re proving my point, that’s a ban because you didn’t like interpretation, not because I violated a rule and most certainly not because it is factually wrong.

Ed: it should be noted that the context you’re arguing for is that I should violently hate jd Vance because we have different opinions and positions. He’s not my enemy, he’s an opponent. Your proving you banned me because I won’t say I violently dislike jd Vance. Come on bud, you’re smart enough to see that is bias.

Read the mod log dude, we’ve had this conversation in private chat three times.

The last strike and subsequent ban were because you disagree with an interpretation of mine. Not that it’s factually wrong, not that it’s hateful, that you disagree and thus you removed it.

Yes, any criticism is just people with anger issues, that’s sorta my point guy.

Ed: also notice I get civility hits from everywhere else, the only ones that contain personal bias are yours.

Removed by mod

Right. Is this your first time encountering an anarchist?

Left. The word you’re looking for is correct, right is an affirmation or direction. Nothing, I want you to explain your belief system so you can see it in front of you and go "well that’s kinda fuckin stupid huh?.

Undoubtedly so I have no doubt.

Idiots tend to laugh a lot so, par for the course I suppose.

Doubt all you’d like it’s not an argument and you didn’t know me well enough to think anything more or less. But do go on.

Am I? I tend to refrain from calling people monkeys because of the obvious implied racism.

Not at all, there are better forms of haven’t government and given this interaction in 100% proof anarchism doesn’t work.

I told you to fucking read because you didn’t before the edit dipshit, you can’t retroactively act less stupid simply because you edited after the fact. I know what to tell you though, stop crying.

Right is an affirmation of receipt, yes no or maybe are the possible answers and you didn’t choose any of the above and still failed to explain.

Anarchism exists yes, that didn’t imply you are an anarchist you could be part of any similarly idiotic idealist nonsense.

If it’s a battle of wit, you’re losing.

Not at all.

• I said anarchism is dumb, you took it personally which is pretty strange honestly. *160, get at me. I’ve explained my position, you’ve made fun of me. What exactly you’re deducing my intelligence from is at best a curiosity at worst simply made up. *See I don’t dislike you, I’d rather a conversation about how school children laugh at anarchists for the stupidity of their ideals. Similarly, you’ve been the crybaby bitch here and you’re doing it now which is amusing. *Add racism? Like I said, you have to be doing Nazi bingo or something. *I don’t get people banned crybaby and you probably wouldn’t get banned for it no matter how much that might play to your edge lord proclivities.

*Edit= sounds like crying about an edit to me.

There’s your explanation then.

No you weren’t, you clearly don’t care or you wouldn’t be playing the troll in another comment chain. Also, no I’m not a conservative and anyway it didn’t make sense in context so it was clearly an error. Again, you tried to make light of the situation and stuck your foot directly in your mouth.

I already did that, fuckin read dude it would solve a lot of these issues.

Yes or no being explainations is what? A new concept to you or something.

So you’re a douche, you could have saved the inane exposition.

I did, you should read again.

https://lemmy.world/comment/13281517

You understand what severe dyslexia is correct?

And yet you are still doing it, funny how that is. Notice me not making fun of your disability.

No.

It’s a typo in that it’s an inadvertantly added word in didn’t catch, sure. And yes on both accounts, are you honestly just trying to win “shitty irrelevant things to make fun of” bingo or something?

Ah and yet your last comment said you know me so we know one thing for a fact, you’re a liar for whatever that might be worth.