minus-squareSaltyBarDog@lemmy.worldtoLeopards Ate My Face@lemmy.world•When i vote R, i didn't think voting for conservatism would conserve to a time before gay marriagelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 hours agoObergefell allowed gay marriage. Obergefell v. Hodges 2015 https://www.wlns.com/news/resolution-introduced-to-overturn-obergefell-v-hodges/ Lawrence is sodomy laws are unconstitutional. Lawrence v. Texas 2003 https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/thomas-wants-supreme-court-overturn-landmark-rulings-legalized-contrac-rcna35228 Griswold is right to use contraception. Griswold v. Connecticut 1965 Loving got rid of anti-miscegenation laws. Loving v. Virginia 1967 https://pwperspective.com/republican-senator-suggests-supreme-court-should-reconsider-loving-v-virginia/ linkfedilink
minus-squareSaltyBarDog@lemmy.worldtoLeopards Ate My Face@lemmy.world•When i vote R, i didn't think voting for conservatism would conserve to a time before gay marriagelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·15 hours agohttps://www.yadvashem.org/odot_pdf/Microsoft Word - 6254.pdf linkfedilink
minus-squareSaltyBarDog@lemmy.worldtoLeopards Ate My Face@lemmy.world•When i vote R, i didn't think voting for conservatism would conserve to a time before gay marriagelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·15 hours agoThe thing about tokens, they get spent. First: Roe overturn. Completed Second: Obergefell overturn. In process. Third: Lawrence overturn. In process. Fourth: Griswald overturn. In process. Soon: Loving overturn. Coming. linkfedilink
Obergefell allowed gay marriage. Obergefell v. Hodges 2015 https://www.wlns.com/news/resolution-introduced-to-overturn-obergefell-v-hodges/ Lawrence is sodomy laws are unconstitutional. Lawrence v. Texas 2003 https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/thomas-wants-supreme-court-overturn-landmark-rulings-legalized-contrac-rcna35228 Griswold is right to use contraception. Griswold v. Connecticut 1965 Loving got rid of anti-miscegenation laws. Loving v. Virginia 1967 https://pwperspective.com/republican-senator-suggests-supreme-court-should-reconsider-loving-v-virginia/