Doesn’t look like it. Outsourcing thinking is one thing: “hey, ai, implement this feature, no mistakes --> straight to production”, outsourcing writing code is another thing: “hey, ai, write such and such code --> review --> this is not needed, that should be done this way --> rinse and repeat, then testing, and only then production”

Edit: problem is, I have no sensible ground to believe enough people at microslop do the latter. Nor am I optimistic about this percentage in general, including people of other professions

Stale Nutela is a greta pun!) Also, agree

Inspiring to see. Well done!

the more poor you are the more likely you are to serve them

I am getting tired of waiting for people to realize what’s in the post and finally take up to pitchforks. That’s not rocket science, come on

Oh no, who did this? (sarcasm. a few people have gone out of their way to ensure everyone else’s suffering)

Someone there surely wants to see the company sink

Here is another one, no compression:

• read image
• send a prompt “regenerate image, here is pixel-by-pixel description”
• enjoy the result

(sarcasm)

Me. But a wide curved one + sway/i3 window manager

Yup, legal problem is there. Not being a lawyer, I see this as a complicated bunch of problems no one is going to solve to the benefit of everyone who actually made this possible (artists, programmers, social media users etc), which is sad (right now I don’t even have the strength to swear)

To anyone who thinks llms are only good at spewing nonsense: well, my experience as well as that of many others says otherwise

I have no good answer to that. My personal choice is ruin/kill any bastard who orders/approves building of data centers in their current state (read: doing damage to everything immediately around them and well beyond that), but I am physically far from anyone in that group

Finally got where I stand: why uncomfortable? It’s just being hard to impose a sensible approach to it:

• yes, llms can be used as a tool efficiently
• no, killing the planet along the way is not an option, this has to stop be stopped

Nah. There is a difference between content of the work and how its value is used. Do I think some bastards well deserve to die and society has been crazy for ages now? Yeah. Do I hate doing my job for it? No

So “never take a job you hate, unless absolutely needed for reasons” is a good advice

attach something to the bottom, pull, fix position

Edit: I am late. kudos for everyone who was faster :)

Nah. The problem the law seeks to address is more money for the rich and more power for the psychopaths. Actual care for children looks nothing close to this

Dunno, it has been fair use all along, why all of a sudden? (sarcasm)

Looks like a rage bait

Duh. Why do you think I switched to Linux the moment I learned it existed

Well, that is bad all over. And also can be seen as an evidence towards “if someone requires access that does not look suspicious, give it to them”: he wasn’t given access, so he went another way and fucked up spectacularly. On the other hand, though:

• if it is a company machine, then not having admin access can be expected
• I would expect that “do not ever use personal accounts for work and vice versa” does not need reminding, but here we are
• yeah, the rules should account for malicious behaviour, intended and not

Rust