Maybe look up atheism then try correcting your own comment instead of theirs :)
In all seriousness, I think your definitions are a few centuries out of date. It’s been drifting toward meaning a-gnostic instead of undecided. Contemporarily, it’s used to explain one’s believed level of knowledge on a claim. I can, for instance, be agnostic toward plate tectonics, and be made gnostic of them by evidence.
“Why! Do users! Dislike! The use! Of emojis! On Lemmy!?”
Overused, they’re just so tiring too read. I think, if you’re gonna go that hard, just full send hieroglyphics and drop the text aspect.
Well, it was a run-on thought! It really does feel that convoluted when you try and figure it out, but rest assured, you’ve now thought about this in more depth than most conservatives!
I choose to believe no one is this particularly misinformed.
It’s really funny bait, though
“walk the bird” has cursed crossover potential with my understanding of British slang
No?? Herpes? Wearing condoms? Are you on the right meme? I think swallow -> must be swallowing cum -> sexual act with a stranger -> fucking said stranger -> getting heerpes -> sore throat is a bit too off the rails. At least, compared to swallow -> throat feels sore -> think im sick
Are you aware of medicine? It’s pretty rude to say “im not disabled like you. It’d be wrong for you to not suffer,” as you did.
Now THIS is podracing
Wow, I can’t believe doom is so young! It’s been a cultural juggernaut my entire life, so it’s weird to think of Doom as “releasing.”
IF you define taking and shrinking a corpse’s. head as a violation of the rights of that corpse’s human rights, then yes. Of course, I disagree with most of what you asserted. I guess my first two questions are “Why does a corpse get rights?” and really just… generally… with the moral system thing. If one feels “the environment” is more important than a human, then they should be pro-kill-all-humans?? I’m not sure that tracks. Most societies have a moral system that’s a little more complicated than “destroy everything that’s not the most morally significant to protect it from being hurt by less moral things.”
Anyway, interesting question! Maybe we should talk about corpse rights as a new category of rights? Less important, perhaps, than living humans, but more important than nothing?
Burdle der warter?? Uh hardly evun knew the wurtur!
…nonexistant?
Read this comment in OneTopic’s voice. Wild. I haven’t watched him in forever.
I dunno, but it’d be funny
Yeah lmao. They already gave up the game in another comment here.
…I tried my girlfriends jeans on my high school because I am a woman. We are not the same :3
What a shit post lmao
…unless you’re serious, in which case, we should consider humanity’s tendency to categorize things. Gender expression and identify are very much bimodal and not binary.
ha, gotem