But it’ll be a great show to watch

That’s what I just figured out.

eh… 60-70% chance I’d guess.
So maybe probably?

That’s what I’m getting at. All the ‘Bad Guys’ who genuinely need the security to do bad things will just move to the other options, along with us tech savvy types. The only people they’ll be able to spy on are the normies who aren’t actually criminals…

Actually I think I get it now. I’m sure for many of them, it’s not about catching criminals at all.

I wonder if they understand, it’ll be impossible to truly stop this.
Even if they get some of the low hanging fruit. People will just move to the more secure, distributed, and anonymous options.
Or are they actually ignorant enough to believe this is something they can solve.

What’ll be hilarious, is when they file a class action suit to get their money back. That’ll be gloriously delicious

LOL…
I promise you she was

Actually?

I use Waterfox also

Chrome is an alternative browser for most people.
I know someone who insists they realy like Edge.

They’re promising not to attack a parade celebrating the defeat of the Nazis in 1945.

Knowing the players in question who would be writing the new constitution

We don’t know who. Members of the current government certainly wouldn’t. They have too much invested in the current system. They’d do everything they could to fight it. No revolution ever included officials or influencers from the old government.

As for what changes would be needed? That would be a massive list. Heavily dependent on details.
Generally speaking:

• More explicit guardrails around corruption.
• Less centralized power in the executive branch. Maybe multiple “Presidents”
• A mechanism for the public to unilaterally recall an elected offical.
• Intrabranch enforcement of powers over each other. So the courts can’t just be ignored.

That’s just the high flyers off the top of my head.

Both recent and high end are rather flexable terms, open wide to interpretation.

If you’re not willing to understand even the basics of what you’re talking about enough to explain your view, there isn’t anything to talk about. You’re just obviously wrong, and you don’t even care to know why. I’ve got nothing more for you.

Are they not supposed to?
I don’t get it.

… Maybe EverQuest?
… Or Doom3?
I really don’t remember, it’s been so long.

That makes sense.
If you want a Cybertruck, you want the all-wheel version.

Killing them is the wrong word. As you said, they already dead.
But setting aside where the energy comes from, the movement signals would still come from the brain. So destroy the brain, and the body stops.

What’s really strange is when a hand gets severed but still moves. If that happens then we’re genuinely looking at some kind of magic, and all logical rules are up for grabs.

How much miscounting? Enough to matter? How. If you want to convince the shortest splitline can be manipulated more than a bunch of people, you need to explain exactly how.

How do you change peoples addresses; Not just a few, but several percentage points? And people don’t interpret anything. That’s the point. The data is collected in the census by thousands of people. You can’t get thousands of people to lie about tens of thousands of addresses when they don’t even know which way to fudge the numbers. Then the computer tells you where the lines are. Nothing for people do to change them. Any attempt to change it will be obvious.

Did you even look at the site I linked? Because all you have is vague promises that people lie. You offer no alternative. If people can just lie about everything (which even Rump has failed to do) what can laws do? Laws are even easier to lie about.