antbricks

They’re pretty huge though. Fine if shelf space isn’t a premium, but 12 drives will be rough on your PSU.

It would be too inaccurate to fingerprint a specific vehicle based on the waveform generated as it drives over a coil sensor like this. For example, if your car drives over it one day and then drives over the same coil but 20cm to the left, the waveforms would be different enough already that they couldn’t be statistically correlated. A large truck driving over an edge could look like a small car driving directly through the middle. These kinds of sensors are really only useful for saying a big chunk of ferromagnetic something passed by.

You’re describing most discovered medicines. But you probably meant “…with no idea why it works…” Since they already saw the outcomes often enough that they want to productize it.

They can make safety, fuel efficiency, usability, and comfort improvements AND enshittify things too! These are complicated machines.

I don’t know if this is the right solution, but a big reason I stopped bringing my family on city buses was because of belligerant personalities making things stressful/scary as fuck on 3 out of my 4 last rides (and less frequently but still really dangerous experiences before that) The frequency was just getting too high and I hit my limit.

Hopefully I just had really shit luck, but if it can happen to me, it can happen to others, and I really want public transit to work.

But all it takes is a system that can’t prevent a few rotten apples from spoiling it for everyone else.

Sounds like you have a pretty sweet deal if you can get by with part time work (with health insurance somehow, I assume) and have nearby grandparents who babysit regularly (and for free). I can’t think of anyone I know with that setup, but I mostly know full time professionals who moved away from parents for school/job. Different circles, I guess.

Neither is actually viewed as healthy. Social parasites are sometimes harder to spot.

For your case it’s the transition that’s tricky: Friends assume you want to keep being friends and may worry if that changes. After a while they’ll give up, assuming you’ve moved on. If you’re sure that’s your path then just stay the course, but know that it’s harder to come back from if you do get lonely. It’s harder to make and keep friends later in life. It’s harder to find a spouse if you’re alone all the time. Interestingly, a spouse + kids may solve your social obligation/boredom problem.

For my case, wife and kids made keeping friends AND a job impossible. Married men are expected to be present at all times for family now except for when at work. Anything regular outside of work is considered neglectful of either your children or your marriage. No hobbies except those that can be done at home after kids go to bed. No social commitments not involving spouse and/or kids. Fatherhood standards are pretty high these days. I don’t have any “friends” anymore, but because I have a family no one asks about it anymore either.

Calcium in the morning and Magnesium after dinner for me.

I’ll assume this isn’t a joke. We did evolve from mammals that used smell to hunt, so yeah, directional smelling sure makes sense to me.

Sorry, no fake internet points for “I almost did it” 😉 Good on ya for buying refurbished though, it’s a real gamble sometimes, unfortunately.

Infrastructure is communist. We each need to just have SUVs large enough to roll over the rivers and forests so we can stop building all those commie roads.

Buying a Framework laptop always felt ideological, not value-based. Like a statement that you want to support Linux-first hardware. Hard to compete without economy of scale, of course, but that wasn’t their main goal.

And the fact that 40% of all taxes represents less than 20% of their income should tell you how much money they’re really holding onto.

Unfortunately, by the tightening up the language, the question resembles more and more “Are there animals with human brains?” To which of course we have to say no, so somewhere along the scale before the question turning into that there must be some version that is an interesting question with an interesting answer.

So what kind of answer are you looking for? An intelligence that resembles human problem solving sufficiently that we could somehow use it ourselves? A fungus can solve a maze through branching in a way that we can’t so its solution isn’t useful for a human actually in a maze. But maybe a linear algebraist could apply the technique to families of problems and a solver could be implemented in specialized hardware more efficiently than a Turing machine GPP.

But I don’t think we left any non-human intelligent species around to compete with us, if you’re looking for a conversation. Neanderthal was the last.

“intelligence is a nuanced topic” Understatement champion. Applying your examples “in any form” still doesn’t really work since those examples are built on communicating the steps as well as the result. If an animal can intuit precision without showing the work, do we still give credit for intelligence? Jumping spiders, for example, have an extremely developed intuition for parabolic trajectories, but I’d bet real money there’s no neural structure in their brains that looks like y^2 = 4ax.

If you are wanting to learn more Linux internals AND create something maintainable, you can create your own distro using Yocto/Bitbake. LFS teaches you all about Linux internals, but kind of leaves you to twist in the wind afterward. I would argue that Yocto exposes those internals AND gives you the ability to maintain the distro you’ve created (roll your own packages, pull in kernel patches/versions/modules, scan for applicable CVEs, etc.)

Or Gentoo sounds cool. Maybe an easier intermediate step before rolling your own.

Agree with this for most folks (using on hands or feet) but if you gotta cover more surface area it can get gone. My 8yo kid had a rash on his thighs and back and we used up a tub pretty quick.

Yes, that was part of the argument, but not the core part, sorry if that was distracting. Social-sexual interaction really clouds all the preassociations people have with dance and layers in a shame element. Dance as a proxy/secondary sexual fitness characteristic creates a false conditional associated with its absence.

I should have emphasized more that even when performed in isolation, dance won’t necessarily tap emotional pathways that aren’t pre-wired or preconditioned. Proprioceptive sensitivity, exertion (endorphin sensitivity), even aerobic fitness will have a large effect on efficacy of this proposed emotional regulatory effect, and those are largely genetically pre-determined. Some people just won’t benefit much from it and shouldn’t be shamed if it doesn’t “fix them”, as if they aren’t in touch with themselves or “close minded”. Maybe being jaded by stuff like this is making me sound “red-pilly”. I’ll have to be more careful, thanks for that. There have been lots of pop psychology “cures” like these. “Scream Therapy” comes to mind from the eighties. Varied success, really depending on the individual.

All that to say: If it works for you, great. But don’t make people do it and then shame them when they aren’t magically fixed. (I know that’s not what you, particularly, are saying)

Same here. There was a window of a couple of months when some NC background process wasn’t running reliably in Android, but that got fixed (a year ago?) and it’s been rock solid before and since.

Which part? That people can be different? I know religion and sexuality can be triggering, so there’s some risk drawing parallels there, granted. Maybe a less controversial comparison might be “an ear for music” or a “sense of direction”? Something with a both nature and nurture components.