

deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Sure - they’re claiming to do two very difficult things simultaneously (net positive fusion and transmute mercury to gold at scale) which makes me even more skeptical. It’s like saying “Not only can pigs fly, but we’ve taught them to simultaneously do calculus.”
This article says (5 tonnes/yr) per GW produced. It’s a fusion reactor, so it’s making electricity, not consuming it.
At $0.05/kWh, 1 GWh of electricity is $438 million. At $3400/troy ounce, 5 tonnes of gold is $545 million. So that jives with the company’s estimate on the article that the sale of gold could double their revenue.
All bunk, of course
Without fail with posts like these, the recent history of the poster contains someone lightly critizing a hot take of theirs. Let’s see if the pattern holds this time…
I’m still batting one thousand
The job posting uses the word “obsess” twice - no frigging thank you
To you, what is the difference between the moon being turned into a black hole and being replaced by a black hole with the same mass?
I don’t disagree with your sentiment. I also don’t know where you live. To clarify though, this story is from the UK.
Looks ok to me using Voyager.