this is news? in 2024? is the ipod fun or listening to music fun?
this is news? in 2024? is the ipod fun or listening to music fun?
i had a lot of fun. i think people just expect too much from this type of game and bethesda. look at no mans sky, i still think its just as boring as when it released but it has gained a great following. people now seem to just assume if a game is made by a AAA team everyone must love it regardless of personal taste. in my opinion that mind set is the reason most AAA get focus grouped to death. im scared that people are going to kill off the type of games i like because everyone acts like its crime to release a game that doesn’t appeal to everyones exact tastes/desires.
i will say though starfield is my least favorite bethesda game. starfield 7/10
why do CEOs never say “lets take our time to avoid making mistakes and insure quality”?
great. i finally get off google and now duckduckgo is bad. i hate the internet.
just admitting you dont know how cooling works. thats cool.
cool.
nevermind then. guess i dont care.
oh, i guess most of the times of heard indie, it was refering to small studios, where as i have never heard anyone call a large studio indie even if they are. thanks for the correction.
and how close is “this” exactly?
why is nobody here saying what the game is an alternative for or what ki d of game play to expect?
what are these alternitives for?
so aren’t all indies small? and the non-american thing is just taste.
Why cant you just say you only like either:
It takes people (souls) for a business to exist.
some people are evil.
Who/Where are these people that believe that? I have heard people say shareholders only care about profits, but I have never heard anyone say it was a law to maximize them. Regardless, they do love profits more than anyone or anything at any company. Companies also like to keep their shareholders happy. Evil comes about becuase of these.
you forgot to show the adjective definition, which is what he is using in his sentence. and you are the one dispensing in petty arguments by continueing the arguement unti you get final say.
i think its worth looking further back in time too.
i guess im confused why 3 TB was chossen. what is this representing. Most people are not transfering 3 TB on a regular basis, 100 GB is a large transfer for common cases. who is this information for? who should be looking into pigeons/jets for regular multi-TB data transfers. just sounds like pigeon propaganda to me.
its like they choose 3 TB because they knew it was the smallest amount that would lose. lets make it a real re-match and go back to transfering 4 GB.
can we just drop this stupid joke that many missed the point of? its getting real annoying real fast. people suck, get over yourselves.