hunter 2
unhackable
hunter 2
unhackable
an email for a receiver that doesn’t exist, more often than not, goes back to the sender after e.g. 72h. That’s by design.
IME they usually proxy and/or prefetch images for caching instead of blocking them. Only spam content is blocked by default.
tldr
I’m glad they’re moving the world update and other massive downloads to something in the cloud and on-demand. Anything between 10-40% of my “play time” on steam was actually downloading stuff.
I’ve used plenty of sshfs a few years ago, but x11 forwarding is a compromise. The latency makes it painful to work with for more than a few minutes.
Same, ranger was painfully slow at times. For some reason it would take multiple seconds to start on a few machines I connected it to.
I can’t believe no one mentioned this, but: remote access.
I spend most of my day connected to machines via SSH and yazi offers a great UX with file previews and all. Using kitty I even get image previews in the terminal.
And I thought developers were bad at naming.
The Microsoft school of naming things is really showing their ways
don’t forget to activate your linux distro
get rid of companies making money off the FOSS
I’m afraid if we discourage companies from adopting open source we’ll end up with even more closed source garbage.
There are industry sectors where closed source is the norm, and it just leads to more vendor lock-in and less standardization and interop.
I’m a bit young to say for sure, but I believe closed source was the norm in the software world 20-30 years ago and openness was stigmatized. I certainly don’t want to live in that world.
it does work though, on windows i can see ads and intrusive crap all the time. Linux distros don’t bother you at all, it’s like linux is not even trying at this point.
as opposed to human-generated code
Scientists using macs connecting to servers and other machines running Linux.
Unknown share is high too; Linux usage on desktop in Antarctica could be as high as 15%.
valid question, idk why would people downvote it
broken websites on desktop are rare and not nearly enough to drive a browser change, but they usually fall into two categories:
websites that “break” on purpose for no good reason when they detect it’s not chromium. Either avoid the site or change the user agent.
websites that degrade some functionalities because they rely on newer features or on how things appear on chromium. They’re usually CSS breakages and do not affect browsing that much.
Support for manifest v2 greatly outweighs these potential issues imo.
top 5 best things I’ve done in the last year
mah man
These things are the other way around. The older something is, the more likely it is to find a bunch of questionable choices, spaghetti code, and security holes.
The questions I have surround the “since 2012” bit. FB exists since 2004, so what happened in 2012? Was it a data dump, a careless logger, system migration, or something else?