LG or Samsung, but the model matters too. If you’re on a budget, there are some solid TCL options

White

But the thing is, there are ways that don’t involve handing over your ID to porn sites.

“I have this great idea but I’m gonna execute it terribly and infringe on your rights” is a classic excuse

That’s just an index fund with extra steps

Which is why we ban people who left…???

Presumably because every tech company hires people who have government cyber experience from any country. Why would one specific company ban anyone who was employed by one specific country?

Personally, I only know 302 (my state) and 5150 (Van Halen album)

Drinking + fat thumbs = bad

Sure but not for much money. I know a dude who sells DDR3 ram on eBay for a few bucks a stick (in bulk)

Thanks for telling me what I said. I keep learning new things

I literally review research in my day job. I’ve never had someone present a study and say “we want to investigate this idea that’s waning in popularity instead of being on the frontier of science”

Benzos are about 5x more common than GHB in date rape cases from what I found. Best I can tell is GHB is about half as common as it used to be. Not super common, but ketamine and z drugs are used. Could even be dumping extra shots into drinks.

TIL that only experts in a field can offer criticism of that topic!

They can detect GHB now? Cool, only 10-20 years after it fell out of favor as a date rape drug

Great suggestion! I’ll read out the them

Funny, I just thought to create AquaSwap, which is a similar idea but for aquarium stuff. Good luck with Seed Swap!

Ohhh now the whole Rust controversy makes sense. I always thought it was weird that they got upset about 1 person dying when hundreds died for the John Wick movies

All hail the quarter earnings report!

That’s not how odds ratios (or research) work. The compares groups of cell phone users and non-cell phone users.

With that being said, we’ve always known cell phone use has a correlation with very slightly increased cancer rates. That shouldn’t be controversial. It’s not concluding that there’s a direct cause or even, if they did cause it, that it’s from RF.

I always knew cancer caused people to use cell phones!

Edit: on a serious note, the confidence interval for malignant tumors is an odds ratio of 1.2-3.4, although a quick google finds more recent studies (I.e.: not based off of 1990s cell phones) are even lower.

Most of the “files” they are hiding are CSAM fwiw. Most of the rest was released with redactions