privacy first.

free julian assange

  • 0 Posts
  • 13 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 17th, 2023

help-circle





  • Uses a new bearer token and a new set of updated endpoints. Only thing missing is search.

    Can someone who’s less stupid than me at programming explain this? From my understanding “endpoints” is a term related to APIs but… nitter just scrapes the site, doesn’t use the twitter API in any way

    EDIT: nvm, the readme says they do use an “unofficial twitter api” of some sort



  • Thanks, but I worry it may have been a little too assholish on my part. Again, I wasn’t trying to bring OP down and definitely don’t want to be one of those smug “I know better than you and will jump on every mistake of yours” types. I know what it’s like to have those kind of people jumping on your throat for a relatively minor thing, because I’ve made this kind of mistake before. Just want to state again that my intent isn’t to dogpile on OP but to remind everyone to be cautious before assuming.

    I edited the comment to remove the unnecessary snarky chromium bit. !@elltee@lemmy.one I’m sorry if this comment made you feel shitty. It isn’t what I intended to do.


  • These are literally default search extensions from Mozilla that come with every vanilla Firefox install - some basic digging would’ve told you that (in fact, your very screenshot shows that the extension IDs come from Mozilla). They’re what allows the search options for those sites in Firefox. If you go to search settings and turn those search engines off, they have zero effect on you. Or better yet, simply hit “remove” in those settings to completely get rid of them, which makes them no longer show up anywhere, even about:debugging.

    You’re welcome to move away from Garuda; it just wouldn’t change anything. You could also fork the code to remove the extensions by default, but at that point ask yourself why neither LibreWolf nor the Garuda team found it necessary to remove these extensions by default if they were actually a privacy threat (and again, you could just remove them yourself in 5 seconds through search settings).

    Honestly, these default search providers could potentially be removed simply because more privacy-focused users have no reason to use such search engines, but that’s something you should take up with the LibreWolf/Garuda team in a polite discussion.

    Here, this post could potentially affect Garuda’s reputation for something that’s completely harmless and is 2 layers upstream from them (FF > LibreWolf > FireDragon). It also makes privacy enthusiasts look silly and paranoid.

    I understand why seeing these would make you suspicious, but the next step would be to look it up somewhere rather than jumping to a conclusion.

    OP, I’m not trying to scold you (and I’m sorry this comment feels that way) . Rather, this is a reminder to everyone here: please do some due diligence before posting stuff.

    (P.S. As someone who once also used this distro and browser, I would also recommend to just setup FF or even LibreWolf the way you want instead of using this specialized distro fork. Not for any malicious reason, but simply because important security updates are bound to come late to a fork of a fork.)



  • https://lemmy.fmhy.ml/post/265796

    here you go, keep in mind that it’s 2 days old so probably best not to comment on it and shake up a pot that’s now settled. just sit back, read and laugh instead

    (wish i could give you a properly formatted link that would load the post in your instance instead of booting you off-site, but as of now i don’t think there’s syntax that lets you share proper links to posts, like there is with communities. does each instance just number every post on the network by itself? so far that’s what it’s been looking like to me)


  • thankfully, that isn’t really the case on your (which also happens to be my) instance.

    we’ve been blocked by precisely one actual instance - the predominantly German-speaking feddit.de, for having open signups, which i’m sure is something we could hash out with them in the future. (technically there are also instances that block us which are run by single persons for their own use. in effect, this amounts to a single user blocking us for themselves, which obviously is fine).

    we ourselves have defederated from precisely one instance - lemmygrad.ml, the political one for authoritarian communists. this was probably done to avoid unpleasant political spam posts from showing up. personally, i think we could get rid of even this one block as the users can decide whether to block that instance for themselves or not; i might post asking about it later.

    and most importantly, the admins here have explicitly stated that the policy is to avoid defederation at all possible avenues. this statement more than anything really made me feel like i chose the right instance.

    FMHY for the win!