JavaScript would have prevented this.

Unless you actively support Mozilla, they could not care less about your boycott.

How many windows do you usually have open in a workspace? Wouldn’t the usual Meta+Direction shortcuts be quick enough for 2-4 windows?

Yeah you can mitigate it. Doesn’t change the fact that if you have no CPU time available, the audio is not getting played.

Audio from low priority processes is expected to stutter under high CPU load. I experience this a lot when playing music while compiling programs.

Pretty cool stuff.

Why would you do that when you can pull 50 JavaScript libraries and wrap it in Electron?

Probably something like “sudo this_gui_app”. This is not possible under Wayland. But who knows? This guy is being as vague as possible with details.

Does Google pay you or something?

No. Does a Google competitor pay you to spread misinformation?

They are an evil company man I assume the worst based on their actions and what they have said.

You can call them whatever you want. What you can’t do is say that Aluminum OS is going to be worse than ChromeOS and that they’re removing the Linux compatibility while knowing there’s no proof of that. That’s called lying.

If you wanna use an OS that will be what Microsoft is trying to make Windows into from day one be my guest.

I have no plans to own an Android PC, and Windows is actually pretty good if you get out of the hate bubble.

For one on ChromeOS I can run whatever Linux shit I want with their compatibility layer.

Have they announced that they’re removing the Linux compatibility layer? Or you got that from the comments too?

Aluminum OS is going to be a locked down like Android is when your carrier locks it down and doesn’t allow users to get root on their phone. They will have an app store with all approved apps on it. Google is currently removing the ability for people to side load apps on their phones (not that most people do that anyway). They will do this on this OS too.

And you know this how? Did they also announce it? Or are you saying this because it shares code with Android? Instead of speculation, we have a real example with Apple. iOS is arguably the most locked down mobile OS, but you can still install whatever you want on MacOS (even literally installing Linux). You are assuming that an OS based on Android (which is more open than iOS) will be more locked down than MacOS.

I need you consider the average tech illiterate person who will use this OS and unknowingly have all of their data get silently sucked into Google’s orbit. Google already does this on Android…they want to capture what you do OFF your phone now on other devices too and control it.

So Google is not collecting data on ChromeOS? Otherwise why even mention this.

What control are you losing with Aluminum OS that you have now with ChromeOS?

Why would this be worse than ChromeOS? It’s not even out yet lol

This is being done because PDF is adopting JPEG XL, so Chromium must support it since it doubles as a PDF reader.

Yeah I wonder if it can try try this on a regular computer

Sway or Hyprland for compositor, Waybar for status bar, fuzzel for app launcher, swaync for notifications, wleave for logout menu.

Everything should work across Hyprland and Sway except for Waybar worskpaces, you need a different configuration for them.

You can’t get more legal than obtaining content directly from the rights holder. It’s more likely that the rights holder is leeching and recording the IP of the seeders.

Retarded title

Cloudflare can’t be forced to censor anything because CDNs are not actually needed by the internet, they’re just nice to have. The only place where they could actually do anything is in the registrar business, where any foul play would just result in de-accreditation by ICANN.

AWS, Azure, and Oracle do have too much power over the internet, but that’s a different scenario.

Why is Cloudflare bad for the internet?

With that much voting power why even bother having a public company.