YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world to

politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago

No, Jack Smith doesn’t have to prove Trump knew he lost

2

2

No, Jack Smith doesn’t have to prove Trump knew he lost

YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world to

politics @lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year ago

2

Opinion | No, Jack Smith doesn’t have to prove Trump knew he lost

Strange as it may seem, why Trump allegedly committed these crimes is beside the point.

Chat

bgrfrtwnr@lemmy.world
link
fedilink
arrow-up
1·
1 year ago
Sadly, that isn’t how it works. The prosecution always has the burden of proof. The accused is presumed innocent.

Let’s not go crazy and act like things are different just because cheeto man is a douche canoe and we want to see him rot in jail.

politics @lemmy.world

politics@lemmy.world

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !politics@lemmy.world

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• Business News

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

15 users / day
15 users / week
15 users / month
15 users / 6 months
0 local subscribers
17.3K subscribers
156 Posts
46 Comments
Modlog