• Album@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s honestly super simple to set up. Outside of your ISP config it’s almost all autoconfig. 100% of the complication (at least for me) comes from knowing ipv4 first for 20 years and then trying to incorrectly map those concepts to V6.

    As soon as I “let go” it was fine.

    There’s not a huge net benefit you’re right. I mostly wanted to learn and I hope to be at the front edge of disabling ipv4 in the near distant future.

    • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      An issue I had the last time I tried to set up IPv6 up was pihole didn’t work as well as I would have preferred. I assumed I just didn’t set up things correctly and it’s looking like that is the case based on the OP.

      It kept resolving ad domains with their IPv6 address.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Who cares if it access them over ipv6. Their still blocked.

        • CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          If ad domains can be resolved to their IPv6 addresses, it means that they are not blocked. Your device connects to the IPv6 address and serves the ad.

          I can’t remember what the problem was but my window to rollback was closing so I reverted back to IPv4 only and pushed it to another day.

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      The benefit is being able to easily access devices from the internet. The same address works on the LAN and WAN. There’s no port forwarding, so multiple devices can have the same port open. You also don’t need to mess with a VPN if your IPv4 connection uses CGNAT.

      • Album@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah dropping Nat is the biggest net benefit I agree but I think the avg person won’t really find that much value in it when Nat works ok

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          And the average person is going to be using it without knowing. And never complain or anything.

        • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          NAT works fine until you get stuck on CGNAT and can’t host anything on IPv4 without using a VPN.

            • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yet.

              As IPv4 blocks get scarcer and ISP’s get more customers, they’ll all eventually have to move to IPv4 CGNAT.

              And that’s completely fine for most people.

              If you’re not one of those people, then IPv6 is your saviour.

          • Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Meh, nothing a VPN and a 3 bucks a month VPS can’t solve…

            yells at cloud in IPv4

    • skittlebrau@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Thanks, I’ll give it a go!

      I suppose it’ll be easy since my whole stack uses IPv4, so I’ll be simply adding another interface on without service disruptions.