(⬤ᴥ⬤)@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · edit-22 months agoi will never understand scientific fraudfiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square13fedilinkarrow-up1153arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up1152arrow-down1imagei will never understand scientific fraudfiles.catbox.moe(⬤ᴥ⬤)@lemmy.blahaj.zone to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · edit-22 months agomessage-square13fedilinkfile-text
like you go to the not-believing-until-seeing convention with lies and what? expect to get away with it?
minus-squareandrewth09@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·2 months agoIts not just the volume of publishing, but the conclusion of the paper if you publish a paper and the result is boring (the X had negligible impact on Y but its inconclusive) you might still put your grant at risk.
Its not just the volume of publishing, but the conclusion of the paper if you publish a paper and the result is boring (the X had negligible impact on Y but its inconclusive) you might still put your grant at risk.