• Raffster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I suppose this discussion has been had countless times. Also the arguments stay the same. It’s not really that much more work and I’m standing next to it while I cook anyway. Also I have limited space so that’s more pressing…

    • folkrav@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Key word “that much more”. It is therefore indeed “more” work, and it’s my, and many other people’s, reason for getting one. I also suppose many discussions we’ve both had in our comment history were also had by other people lol

      • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think it ends up being the same amount of work for me. Rinse rice (optional), figure out correct amount of water for that type of rice, place on heat until done. Rice cookers can effectively detect that there’s no more liquid water, but that isn’t the same as “done” unless you used the right amount of water.

        IMO, rice cookers are really handy if you are the type of person who eats rice as a staple food item that you buy in giant sacks and eat the same variety of every day. I have like 6 kinds of rice I rotate through, so I think it wouldn’t save me enough work to justify a separate gadget.

        I’ve never used one of the really fancy pressure cooker rice cookers, though, so maybe my feelings would be different.

        • folkrav@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Ah, yeah, that’s probably it. I eat patna rice pretty much exclusively, and multiple times a week lol. Some rice types (especially whole-grain, brown or wild rice varieties) have different water ratios and indeed kind of defeats the whole set-and-forget thing.