• thesmokingman@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Interesting. I was able to access the linked whitepaper and repositories without trouble and the 3rd party stuff too. Do you have local config preventing you from downloading the source code to review?

    While I can respect your distaste for non-libre software, you’ll need to back up the malware claim. There are real security concerns out there in common non-libre; labeling things that are not libre as malware solely because they are not libre muddies the waters and makes your message much less palatable.

    • Autonomous User@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Like they can’t show half an app and data-rape me with the other half.

      While it keeps banning us from proving its claims, i’ll never let them infect my devices.

        • Autonomous User@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          It’s anti-libre software. We do not control it.

          It bans us from modifying its source code, sharing exact and modified copies, using it for any purpose, etc.

          What software license do you think Discord is distributed under? Never heard of copyright law?

              • toastal@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                3 months ago

                Responding broadly to the thread of folks talking about userScripts & add-ons. This effort would be better put to getting folks to a different protocol where client modification & alternate clients are the norm.

          • Blxter@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’ve been using a modified client for about 2 and a half years now without being banned.

      • thesmokingman@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        The claim is that audio and video are E2EE. I’m not sure how you’re unable to disprove that using the linked code, audit report, and COTS debugging tools. Can you expand on that? I see a lot of FUD without anything more than “they’re not libre” which, again, doesn’t do a great job of selling your point.

        • Autonomous User@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Just reverse engineer me bro

          And every update, every other app, all their updates too, across every device… 🚩

          Should we just waste our whole lives nothing but knee deep in disassembled binaries?

          How stupid and gullable does openly hostile Discord think we are?

          Couldn’t be me still coping and shilling trash like this.

          • thesmokingman@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            In another post you’re actively looking at purchasing GPS systems. The satellites you’re sending info to are not available to dissect and I highly doubt the firmware of the devices you’re looking at is publicly available much less libre. Your trolling is not internally consistent so it’s clear you don’t have any clue what you’re on about. Good luck with that.

            • Autonomous User@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Their are bound by software licenses of software on their devices. I am bound by software on my devices. Their software ain’t my problem.