How do people feel about donating to keep things running smoothly and making sure there are adequate resources and compensation for those involved in running .world instance?

I’m curious as I think this kind of rapid growth will be the first time the model is really being tested - as in, large rapid growth in users and activity resulting in sudden higher running costs.

I feel transparent engagement would be good to understand what the current costs are, how that scales and how people involved in keeping things running are fairly compensated for their time and effort.

Also having an issue tracker, roapmap etc public and real engagement let people see who and what they are investing in.

It’s an awesome job to see the server still standing after such a huge influx!

  • Meuzzin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I will have no problem throwing money their way. I’m not stingy when it comes to a service I use. Especially when it’s done out of passion, and those involved are dumping their free time and personal income into it, without expected returns. Anything FOSS falls into that category. I donate to my Torrent site, my Linux Distro’s developers, etc. Someday, when I win the Lottery, I’ll drop them all bags of money. Until then, I’ll throw you guys (lemmy.world) what I can…

  • phx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Kinda feel like know only do the instances (like lemmy.world) need to get some decent funding, but also the devs.

    The instances need to pay for hardware or hosting, plus maybe admin work (obviously people will do it for love but cash is nice too), but as a fairly fledgling platform, there’s also going to be some serious dev work needed to fix bugs, close exploits, improve efficiencies, and add features. Even the best host can be dead in the water if the underlying software has an unfixed exploit or lacks the features needed to maintain/optimize it. It’s one of the reasons people flocked to 3rd-party Reddit clients, after all (because Reddit themselves couldn’t be arsed to build up the tools themselves).

  • Fortychops@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would be happy to donate, however I would like to be differentiated from users who haven’t donated. Maybe with a status symbol, some thing like a blue checkmark beside my name perhaps?

    • qwop@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      On that note, I think a post view limit would be good too. Maybe 10 posts a day for accounts who haven’t donated and 100 for those who have?

      • DocMcStuffin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Poe’s law - without a clear indicator of the author’s intent, any parodic or sarcastic expression of extreme views can be mistaken by some readers for a sincere expression of those views.

    • SkySyrup@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve seen the idea of a “reddit gold” being thrown around - eg you pay to get a post or comment a different color or effect and the money goes to the instance admins

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        As long as it doesn’t boost the comment in any way. Paying to make a comment more visible doesn’t sit well with me.

    • Vincent St. Pierre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Calckey has that. And so do other Fediverse alternatives.

      It’d be nice to have some flair or a shiny object to showcase contributions to the funding effort. And something really simple would be excellent.

    • Overzeetop@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, I don’t care. I don’t wear a gold star to basketball when I sweep the court, bring the pennies, or we use my ball - it’s part of being able to play.

      Could I stand up my own instance? Yes. Do I want that headache? Fuck no. I’ll chip in any time my instances think they’ll need the cash. It’s what a community does.

      Oh and, for the record, Fuck Spez. I’m never giving that money grubbing whore a single cent.

  • Gray@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Since “Web2.0” or rather, the VC backed tech businesses that ran on potential value rather than realized value over the past decade seem to be dying out this year, I think the new model of internet we’re heading towards will involve users understanding the costs to run a server (both literal costs and labor costs) and paying their fair share. I think this model is much cheaper for everyone though because it doesn’t involve corporate greed. These new companies won’t be on the stock market trying to turn into profit machines. And we don’t need a huge staff producing unnecessary new features - that’s the beauty of open source tech. We’re all working on making those new features together as a gift to everyone. But the server costs are there and donations will be needed at an affordable price. The more generous donors will fill the cost gaps that those without the financial means to pay leave. But yeah, everyone who can afford to should help pay a portion of the monthly costs to their admins. At the same time, admins should be nakedly transparent about what those costs are and any shady attempts to make an extra buck by not being transparent should be met with users moving to different servers.

    • kiddblur@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree that it’s needed, and I plan on supporting my instance (although as of right now he has made it sound like there’s plenty of donations coming in), but I’m skeptical that the average person will chip in. I couldn’t even get my family to chip in on our shared {streaming service} subscription before they got kicked off it for not being in my household.

      • Gray@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh yeah, this will undoubtedly end up being a fraction of us. As long as it pays the bills it’s enough. I’m sure the admins will sound the alarms if they’re falling short on funding needs.

    • trouser_mouse@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Very much agree - and potentially a new concept for a lot of people, which is why I thought this was an interesting question!

  • bananaphone@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I happily am donating on patreon. Throwing in a few bucks for something I plan to use frequently is not a problem. Long live lemmy world.

  • flamekhan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I already signed up for the $5/month Patreon for lemmy.world and I would happily do more if Lemmy really takes off. I have no issue paying a nominal amount of money to support a community that I’m part of.