Giving money to Amazon, Wal-Mart, Microsoft, Google .etc

It’s like, you can’t have an argument for price gouging, when you’re enabling them by spending. If people were smart, they’d stop giving them money 10 - 15 years ago and they’d be right now, trying to reconstruct so they can be more economically friendly than how they are now.

  • finderscult@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    They’d stop doing capitalism. Entirely. If people in the US were smart, they would have been the vanguard of the communist revolution in the late 1800s when Marxist ideas were starting to spread in the us.

    • Kache@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      That depends, people can be smart but malicious, non-coorperative, or selfish.

      The prisoner’s dilemma shows that there are systems where individually, the “smart” individual thing to do is globally non-optimal.

      Even smartness and altruism alone isn’t enough. Medical professionals are smart and out to help others, but any ER doc/nurse will tell you they have limited trust in their patients (rightly so in the real world).

      Does “everyone is smart” also include both “altruism and cooperative trust in others”?

    • emmie@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Marxism is critically flawed about surplus value and definitions of egalitarianism unfortunately so while it all sounds nice on paper it never worked in practice

      • finderscult@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Except it’s currently working in practice in many countries, one of which is more successful by every measure than the US. Also Marxist-leninism is responsible for being more people out of poverty than any other system of socioeconomics.