infinite_ass@leminal.space to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · edit-22 days agoThe whole world population dead or only 99% dead (keeping the wealthy 1%). Which do you choose and why?message-squaremessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up115arrow-down144
arrow-up1-29arrow-down1message-squareThe whole world population dead or only 99% dead (keeping the wealthy 1%). Which do you choose and why?infinite_ass@leminal.space to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · edit-22 days agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squareblackbrook@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoOk, but do you really think the next one percent down is much different?
minus-squareZoift [he/him]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-21 day agoDo you think the kind of circumstances that would lead to the 1% being ended would be conducive to another slotting itself in without problem?
minus-squareProfessorOwl_PhD [any]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoI really don’t think you understand the scale of the ultra wealthy - the top 1% own almost half of the world’s wealth. Yes, the next 1% are much different, as they don’t own almost half of the entire world’s money.
Ok, but do you really think the next one percent down is much different?
Do you think the kind of circumstances that would lead to the 1% being ended would be conducive to another slotting itself in without problem?
I really don’t think you understand the scale of the ultra wealthy - the top 1% own almost half of the world’s wealth. Yes, the next 1% are much different, as they don’t own almost half of the entire world’s money.