• Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought she must have thought that the hot air in the opposite direction would somehow actually slow down a car. Grandma is definitely smarter than me.

  • neatchee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Chaotic isn’t just quirky. This is clearly lawful good, given the fact that she’s inducing people to, you know, follow the law.

    Chaotic good would be if she only did it to cars worth more than $20,000 because “the threat of a ticket puts too much stress on people with so little money that a speeding ticket might mean they can’t make rent.”

    • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, it’s chaotic. A lawful person might ask the cops to set up a speed trap there, as it’s their responsibility. She’s out there getting drivers to follow the law in her own way.

      • neatchee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Chaotic motivation and lawful action are not mutually exclusive, in my experience. Lawful good is believing that there is a right code to live by - “the law” - be that an actual legal system, or a creed.

        Chaotic good, on the other hand, is still good, but it’s a very personal, sometimes selfish good. They do not have a book or spoken history to point to and say “this is what’s right.” But they know it when they see it.

        That’s how I’ve always explained it to people, after having it explained to me as that 🤷

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think people are too strict on defining alignment. It makes things less fun. For example, I played a Paladin who had a personality that was somewhat selfish, but warshipped a lawful good god. This required his behavior to be lawful good even if it wasn’t what he wanted to be doing. His personality was more true neutral or maybe neutral good. What’s the alignment of the character?

          • neatchee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            … That’s either neutral or chaotic. Maybe even true neutral? They don’t respect the law. They get something from the law. That is not lawful good, IMO

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The actions were always lawful good. There’s a large philosophical argument about actions versus intent for a reason. It’s not that simple.

              • neatchee@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m speaking to alignment of a character, not a specific action. In your example, regardless of the action itself, the character is not being Lawful Good. They are not interested in the creed itself for its own sake. They are interested in what they get from following the creed. That’s not Lawful Good, no matter how you slice it IMO

                • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Sure, I agree. There are plenty of philosophers who would argue otherwise though. I just think alignment as the nine quadrants gets stale. People should be willing to take other outlooks.

                  There are millinia of philosophers arguing about morality. The typical D&D quadrants are boring in comparison. The people in the world won’t care if something good happens just because the paladin wanted to impress their god. They’ll just be happy that something good happened. Will the god care? That’s up to them (and the DM).

                  Does a lawful character follow the law because something bad will happen otherwise, or do they morally agree with lawfulness? Both follow laws equally, but one doesn’t always agree with them.

        • dfc09@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Chaotic and lawful are opposite ends of the matrix, evil and good are similarly opposites. Ignoring neutrality, we can look at a punnet square-esque 2x2 grid of chaotic good - chaotic evil -lawful good - lawful evil

          The way I see it (and this is a hotly debated topic, so it’s all pretty firmly in the realm of interpretation) is that lawful good is akin to a benevolent government, chaotic good is akin to Robinhood, lawful evil is akin to a fascist regime or dictatorship, chaotic evil is akin to the joker.

          There’s a lot of nuance between those extremes, of course, but to make broad strokes you can ask “are they working within or without a strong system” to get lawful vs chaotic, and “are they trying to help others or hurt others” to get good and evil.

          Using those questions gives a good basis to start dissecting people and characters.

          Hitler worked within the political system to create a new totalitarian regime and harm the people who fell outside it. Lawful evil.

          Robinhood flaunted laws and committed crimes in the pursuit of helling those in need. Chaotic good.

          You’ll note that chaotic, whether good or evil, doesn’t build societies or ideologies. They’re more focused on their own goals. Lawful creates structure for societies to confirm to.

          • neatchee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            This is a great start but I think the most important of the many nuances is that lawful doesn’t mean governmental, and chaotic doesn’t mean anarchic.

            A king who acts purely on whim with no consistency to the rule of law, even if there are supposed to be rules to follow, is chaotic

            A paladin who follows an ancient code passed down through a single master/apprentice relationship for generations is Lawful

            I’ve always seen it as: lawful = there is a higher authority to which the character is committed, even if they’re the only one committed to it. Chaotic =acting only/mostly with your own purpose at heart, even if that is wrapped up in a lawful-looking package.

            tl;dr: chaotic characters can use legal systems, and powerful characters can be fiercely independent

            • dfc09@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I agree!! I tried to parse my own comment as “hey this is a big fat opinion soup” just because the alignment chart is highly debated and often forgone entirely as too restrictive. Lots of motivations that buck the chart entirely.

    • chillhelm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The method is neither chaotic nor lawful. The motivation is. If she wants to enforce the speed limit, she is lawful. If she doesn’t care about the speed limit and just wants the cars to slow down, she’s chaotic.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah, l ts not design roads to make people want to drive the right speed, let’s just continue with the 1960 mentality that ll roads must be like highways and continue being surprised that people drive too fast.

    Let’s also not design cities for people, let’s design them for cars. Car manufacturers say we need more and bigger cars so let’s demolishh nice buildings for more hellish parking lots. Climate change is a hoax as we all know, so let’s not design cities for people where they can walk and cycle everywhere because we know that the 25 minute city is a conspiracy theory to make the frogs gay… or something…

    I’m so tired of reading shit about shit that could be fixed so easily. It’s like watching somebody wipe their ass with their hands and complain about shit on their hands and I’m just sitting here waving with toilet paper but they just look at me like I’m crazy.

    People deserve this shit because they don’t want solutions

    • RGB3x3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      In the US, we don’t use the government for the collective good of the people. If it’s something that individuals and small groups can do themselves, it’s “not the government’s job.”

      Managing speeding? Post on social media about how people need to slow down. Do what grandma do.

      Feeding school children? Have a food drive one time a year for the community and forget about it the rest of the time.

      Need to pay for medical care? Run a Go Fund Me and get your neighbor’s help.

      Many americans will open their pockets for small charities, but god forbid you tax them a little more so that everyone benefits from a more efficient system.

      We the people apparently want to feel empowered to run an inefficient system ourselves.

  • Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Please don’t turn this into another c/memes with a bunch of non-meme garbage posts…

    The number of people who are perfectly fine with a garbage dump is sad.

      • Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        And that has exactly what to do with hoping this community doesn’t become a dumping ground for no-effort posts?

        I appreciate you taking the time to so thoroughly peruse my post history though.

        I also appreciate the meme. I’ll work on that.

    • BigFig@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Please don’t turn this into another memes comment section with a bunch of bitching and moaning

        • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The voting system exists for a reason. There’s no need to play personal gatekeeper and tell people they can only post what you want.

          • Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            The voting system means shit when people such as yourself don’t give a fuck about relevance of content and upvote anything and everything. Don’t give me this gatekeeping bullshit for asking that posts be made where they belong.

            Other communities will never grow if there’s one garbage dump for everything.

            • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I didn’t upvote anything and you need to grow up. Other communities won’t grow if you’re acting like a shithead to everyone you speak to.

              • Ghyste@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m sorry, what? I asked that consideration be given to content so this community doesn’t become another dumpster fire. You’re the one who decided to be an asshole and I responded in kind, and now you just have to keep this going.

                Other communities won’t grow if… What the hell are you talking about? You’re trying to parrot everything I’m saying to the point of stupidity. Piss off.

                • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Wow. You need to work on your communication skills. Seriously. Luckily I’m well aware of how to use the tools at my disposal instead of whining about other people not doing what you want. It’s easy enough to block you. Feel free to respond, but I won’t care.