• Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’d still like to get the sources. Otherwise, content like this is like disinformation spreads. Meme community or not.

    • M137@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      With the time you took to comment you could have looked it up yourself, and then with a bit more time you could have posted the sources here. You’re consciously choosing to not be informed, and to do nothing yourself and expect random people to do work for you.

      • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Researching “20” is hard. Israel certainly likes to claim that other side breaks ceasefires. There is usually an opposing narrative.

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It’s OP’s responsibility to give sources on the issue. Don’t shoot the messenger.

      • errer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        And you could have done the same and posted it for the rest of us instead of wagging your finger.

        Number of ceasefires: https://kyivindependent.com/zelensky-gave-trump-list-of-all-ceasefires-violated-by-russia/

        Number of talks: https://www.ukrinform.net/rubric-polytics/3784793-kuleba-ukraine-held-200-rounds-of-talks-with-russia-since-2014-but-that-did-not-stop-putin.html

        The source for the meme appears to be a tweet from the Ukraine foreign minister. Zelensky has quoted similar numbers. These numbers are coming out of Ukrainian officials’ mouths and not 3rd party journalists and it’s not at all clear on how they’re counting since I can’t find easily any other sources.

        Side note: with how bad Google is nowadays, people should never chide anyone else for being unable to locate a source themselves again.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          “Russia violated all of the ceasefires and talks since 2014, but it is really important that the exact number is verified by 3rd parties.”

          You dismissing the overall point by focusing on the absolute least important detail. If the number of talks and ceasefires is greater then zero and Russia has violated all of them, then why does it matter if there were two dozen or two hundred?

          • errer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Because details fucking matter, that’s why? It matters even if the side I’m on is the one potentially exaggerating. Don’t you care to know that? Or do the facts not matter to you anymore?

            • snooggums@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              13 hours ago

              Because when someone starts arguing that there were 33 violations and not 35 or something along those lines I know they are just trying to derail the discussion away from the point that matters: Russia has consistently violated ceasefires and that is why security guarantees are needed.

              • errer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                13 hours ago

                That’s an assumption that it differs by only a few from the truth. What if it’s off by a factor of 2? 5? You and I do not know.

                I want to believe the Ukrainians here because it would be confirmation bias. But it would be better to have reliable numbers from an unbiased sources.

                • snooggums@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  You are holding a victim of violent aggression to a high standard instead of just acknowledging that their point is right whether or not they described everything in minute detail perfectly accurately.

      • Glitterbomb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        We’re talking about major recent history from 2014. Unless they’re 12, they don’t really have an excuse to be this ill informed for an entire decade. The time it took to comment is a drop in the bucket compared to the rest of their time spent in willful ignorance.

    • Phineaz@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I absolutely agree on your point about misinformation. I was trying to hint that maybe none of this belongs here, despite me personally resonating with the “meme”. I guess I am just rambling, don’t mind me.

    • Onarock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I agree with you about sources, but instead of asking and waiting you can search for them as well. I did a quick search for some of the information in the image and I got some results about 200 rounds of talks since 2014. Not ones I recognize so I can’t say if they’re legit or not but it only took a few seconds to get that at least that far.

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I’m not OP, though. Not everyone will do the googling themselves and if you’re posting stuff like that, I think it’s a responsibility of the OP to supply the sources.

        Otherwise, that’s the exact same strategy misinformation peddlers like LibsofTiktok use.

        • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          LibsOfTiktok, on the right, was effective. They are, apparently, much better at motivating people than you are.

          Also, let’s not pretend you don’t just disagree with what is being said. Nobody asks for sources until it’s an issue somebody might pick up a sign over.

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            LibsOfTiktok, on the right, was effective. They are, apparently, much better at motivating people than you are.

            I don’t get why you’re comparing me to libs of tiktok. Do I look like I’m trying to be an influencer to you? O.o

            Also, let’s not pretend you don’t just disagree with what is being said.

            I think it’s naive to take anything someone as biased as Selensky is saying at face value.

            Nobody asks for sources until it’s an issue somebody might pick up a sign over.

            Lol, first day on the internet, I assume? xD /j

            • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 hours ago

              Do I look like I’m trying to be an influencer to you?

              You’re arguing with one. What do you think OP is doing?

              as biased as Selensky

              Ah, so you’re not impartial. Funny how easy it was to figure that out.

              • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                How is stating that Selensky has a horse in this race a sign of not being impartial, exactly? O.o

                • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Because you would care about the validity of the statements, you wouldn’t be suggesting that Zelensky is a liar.

                  I can smell it on you, dude, like the breath of an alcoholic. Why are you pretending you don’t know what this whole Ukraine thing is about? It’s been world news for 3 years.

                  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    4 hours ago

                    you wouldn’t be suggesting that Zelensky is a liar.

                    Are you serious? 🙄

                    Are you this dense that you don’t get that politicians conducting a bloody war have a vested interest in maintaining a specific narrative?

                    Why the fuck do you start with this playground comic book logic bullshit? This is the real world, buddy.

                    No, certainly! Selensky senpai is definetly one of the good guys who would never lie to me uwu! The only liar is eeevil Mr Putin who is eeeevil, because he attacked poor Ukraine because he’s eeevil! /s

                    And before you start: no I am not sympathetic to Putin, just because I don’t buy the narrative of the evil russians. Trying to undertand the objective reasons why states act the way they do apparently means that you’re a paid russian troll or whatever.

      • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        14 hours ago

        This isn’t disinformation unless you don’t believe Zelensky.

        yeah, not exactly the most unbiased source, I recon. If something is disinformation or not shouldn’t really hinge on whether you believe someone, btw.

        Besides that, we’re talking about large scale violations.

        So? Even easier to get sources, right?And even more suspicious that it doesn’t ring any bells.

        The sources you supplied are literally participants in the NATO/Russia conflict.

        I suggest using a search engine.

        Pardon my French, but: Screw you.

        • LePoisson@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Well the source is one of a number that document violations of the Minsk agreement. You don’t just need to read that one and it’s from 8 years ago I just grabbed it to show how long Russia has been ignoring their related ceasefire agreements. I think the source is relatively neutral but you are right it may have some bias, it’s about as neutral as English language sources come though.

          I think this post may be off in interpreting or wording because Russia has had major violations of a number of treaties, notably recently the Minsk agreement but I think Zelensky is talking about 25 major violations not 25 separate agreements.

          Regardless of all of that, Russia has a very long history of not honoring their truces and ceasefires and using them as a reprieve to beef up their military forces before continuing to fight.

          Your French has been pardoned but fuck you too pal.

          • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            10 hours ago

            The source still is the US government, i.e. NATO. It can hardly be interpreted as impartial.

            You’re touching on why “just google it” is a horrible advice: sources in english language will emphasize the western consensus who have a vested interest in weakening Russia and are in an active economical war with Russia. it’s really hard to find english speaking, impartial sources.

            From what I found online, while the claims of “genocide” are blown out of proportion, Ukraine has still also violated the Minsk treaty by attacking Donbas.

            I think it’s important to note that I don’t want to condone neither Russia, nor Ukraine. Even if everything is true about Russian minorities in the Donbas: I don’t think that being conscripted is too much better. But I also think that the Ukrainian state is using its’ own population as cannon-fodder to fight a proxy war for the west (if it weren’t a proxy war, the changing stance of the US wouldn’t be as big of a problem).

            Fuck states. All of them. No war but class war.

            • LePoisson@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 hours ago

              What do you want me to say, that it’s clear Russia continually violates ceasefire for the past 20 years of various nation states?

              Like idk you can go find plenty of sources that say that I’m sure some won’t be in English but you’re not going to ever find something from Russia themselves that says “yeah we violated this shit”

              • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 hours ago

                What do you want me to say? I already said that I don’t want to excuse Russia or its’ imperialism.

                But I also don’t think that just because Russia is an imperialist nation that you should in turn start hero-worshipping Selensky. As the interests of the Ukrainian state diverged from the interests of the Ukrainian people that it uses as cannonfodder for its national interest.

                The enemy of my enemy is not automatically my friend. Two parties can be inexcusable (compare: Israel and Hamas). No war but class war.