• yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’d be surprised if many “producers” are caught. From what I have heard, most uploads on those sites are reuploads because it’s magnitudes easier.

    Of the 1400 people caught, I’d say maybe 10 were site administors and the rest passive “consumers” who didn’t use Tor. I wouldn’t put my hopes up too much that anyone who was caught ever committed child abuse themselves.

    I mean, 1400 identified out of 1.8 million really isn’t a whole lot to begin with.

      • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Not quite. Reuploading is at the very least an annoying process.

        Uploading anything over Tor is a gruelling process. Downloading takes much time already, uploading even more so. Most consumer internet plans aren’t symmetrically either with significantly lower upload than download speeds. Plus, you need to find a direct-download provider which doesn’t block Tor exit nodes and where uploading/downloading is free.

        Taking something down is quick. A script scraping these forums which automatically reports the download links (any direct-download site quickly removes reports of CSAM by the way - no one wants to host this legal nightmare) can take down thousands of uploads per day.

        Making the experience horrible leads to a slow death of those sites. Imagine if 95% of videos on [generic legal porn site] lead to a “Sorry! This content has been taken down.” message. How much traffic would the site lose? I’d argue quite a lot.