• LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yes, it is seeded with kids’ faces, including specific children like someone’s classmate. And yes, those children, all of them, who it uses as a reference to make a generic kid face, are all being abused because it’s literally using their likeness to make CSAM. That’s quite obvious.

    It would be different if the AI was seeding models from cartoons, but it’s from real images.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      OK, so this is just the general anti-AI image generation argument where you believe any image generated is in some meaningful way a copy of every image analyzed to produce the statistical model that eventually generated it?

      I’m surprised you’re going the CSAM route with this and not just arguing that any AI generated sexually explicit image of a woman is nonconsensual porn of literally every woman who has ever posted a photo on social media.

      • LustyArgonian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        No, I am not saying that.

        I’m saying if an AI image is sexual and seeded from irl child models, then it is CSAM.

        Adult women who consensually post their image to social media are WAY different than children who can’t consent to even enter a contract.

        Also, I did argue that already when I mentioned how many AI porn models are directly seeded from Scarlett Johansson’s face. Can you read?