1
Natural Philosophy - SLRPNK
slrpnk.netA collaborative space of exploration into questions about the natural world, and
meta-questions such as what constitutes an answer, a question, or why we can
even ask questions in the first place. Submissions should be relevant to
scientific subjects somehow rooted in physics. It can get blurry sometimes, but
if you can answer the question “How could this help us understand the nature of
our perceived reality?” you should be ok. These are the informal guidelines we
follow here: 1. The questions we pose, we believe to have falsifiable answers
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability]. 2. The answers we put forth, we
believe to be falsifiable. 3. The discussions we have, we have in good faith and
in the genuine interest of identifying, understanding or communicating the kind
of questions and answers we believe can satisfy the above points. 4. The
arguments we present, we make a reasonable effort to present alongside
assumptions and biases we are able to identify as relevant, and we remain humble
to the fact that we can’t identify them all. Submissions and comments are
moderated on a subjective case-by-case basis to facilitate and maintain a
healthy, cosy, and rewarding environment for you who would come here with a
genuine interest in learning, participating or merely observing others engage in
natural philosophy. Just to state some obvious (non-exhaustive set of)
behaviours and content we won’t have here: bigotry; hate speech; sealioning
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sealioning]; strawmen
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man]; pseudo-/anti-science;
dis-/misinformation. Additional context may be taken into consideration as well.
For those of you on Matrix, there is a super-space which tries to aggregate
scientific chat rooms and spaces: https://matrix.to/#/#science-space:matrix.org
[https://matrix.to/#/#science-space:matrix.org]
A place to discuss and share content about what may or may not be, and why it is so.
You must log in or register to comment.