• ripcord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    There are virtually no .exes that are zip files with another extensionm. They are executable binary files and nearly always require a slew of support files (just like Linux binary executables)

    • IngeniousRocks (They/She) @lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 days ago

      Is that not common anymore? I remember back in the day I’d commonly end up with installers that were just self exteacting archives with a little extra. Idk I haven’t used windows basically at all in at least a decade

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Installers. The vast majority of .exes are not installers. The thing you actually run would be an .exe (and all the other files) deployed by the installer to some directory.