Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for six justices: Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Neil Gorsuch, and Amy Coney Barrett. All six agreed on the core holding. Roberts, Gorsuch, and Barrett formed a three-justice plurality on the major questions doctrine rationale; the other three declined to join that section.
As Roberts wrote, the government’s reading of two words in the statute, “regulate” and “importation,” claimed for the president the power to impose tariffs “of any product, at any rate, for any amount of time.” The majority’s response was direct: “Those words cannot bear such weight.”
The statutory argument is simple once you see it. Tariffs are a tax. The Constitution assigns the taxing power to Congress in Article I, Section 8. The framers, as Roberts put it, “did not vest any part of the taxing power in the Executive Branch.”
Amazing that we have a Supreme Court more willing to defend Congress’s power of the purse more than Congress itself.
It’s incredible.
They were raised, practically from birth, to fulfill a multi-generation effort to trojan-horse a partisan agenda into a supposedly apolitical body.
But their plan had one fatal flaw: in order to get there… they would have to read. And not only that… also engage in critical thinking.
Such as considering that their own base of power really hates being taxed.
Like, everyone does, but the idea of building roads or paying to stop diseases just drives them absolutely insane.
When your plan works a little too well.
