• Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    I swear people do not understand the point of what microsoft does.

    There isn’t a team tasked with making teams worse. They’re tasked with extracting all possible value out of their product. Part of that value is infromation like where you are, what you’re doing, what you’re talking about, what you search for, what you actually do for your job, who is around you, what they talk about, where they are, what they are doing, what they search for, and what they do for their job and how everyone spends their money.

    All of this is incredibly valuable data to governments, businesses and private individuals that want to advertise, suppress dissenting political voices, enhance useful dissenting political voices, and otherwise manipulate global influence.

    They just don’t want you to think about declining any permissions, triggering regulatory action, or switching to another platform.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        You’ve got it reversed. Switching to Teams greatly hastened development, as the team’s newfound vitriol and frustration could be channeled toward the end user in a neverending feedback loop.

      • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Literally! They were told to return to office to achieve higher productivity (it was circling the news around September?)

        • Archer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          It was obviously just a corpo stealth layoff but imagine being told as a Teams developer that Teams is not good enough for remote work

    • Dave@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Just one team working on Teams, and they are doing their best to make it worse.

      I for one encourage them, it apparently needs to be even worse before my work will consider changing

  • Ghostie@lemmy.zipdeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    I wonder if the team that is tasked with making teams worse has team meetings with the whole team on teams.

  • lasta@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    This is what I gathered on the subject, feel free to correct if anything is wrong:

    The WiFi tracking works by scanning for nearby WiFi networks, identifying which routers are nearby and their signal strengths, matching those against their database of known WiFi access points, and using that data to estimate your location.

    For now the feature will be off by default, first has to be enabled by your company, and then the user has to opt in for it to be used.

    For those who are required to use Microsoft products, it can by bypassed by using a wired Ethernet connection and not using Teams on any devices using a wireless connection.

    Edit: As @lividweasel@lemmy.world pointed out, Microsoft is not using WiFi positioning systems to determine location, but rather updating your location to “in the office” or not depending on whether your device is connected to one of the organization’s WiFi SSIDs.

    • lividweasel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      That doesn’t at all match the documentation.

      The organization will configure a list of Wi-Fi SSIDs. When your device connects to one of those, the Teams location would be updated to “in the office”.

      That’s it. No complex triangulation, no pinpoint locating. Just “are you connected to the office network or not”.

      Also, if you don’t want to be tracked in this way, just don’t participate. If your organization sets a policy to opt you in automatically, click the option to opt out. If they give the offer to opt in, just don’t.

      I know it’s hip to hate on Microsoft, but we should at least discuss things based on the truth, not wild assumptions and misinformation.

  • lumettaria@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Tenant admins will decide whether to enable it and require end-users to opt-in.”

    If you require someone to opt-in, they’re no longer “opting in”

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Teams comes pre installed with windows these days.

      I recommend KDE Plasma on any linux distribution that comes with it for people interested in recovering their digital sovereignty.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    My employer has the usual setup of M365 enterprise shit running on Dell laptops.

    Fortunately we devs are able to “dual boot” to run Linux on our machines, since our product is an embedded Linux system. (has anybody seen my Windows partition btw? I can’t even find anything NTFS formatted, whoopsie!)

    All that background info is just so I can pay Microsoft a compliment, even if it has asterisks all over it:

    The entire Microsoft suite works just fine in a browser, and in LibreWolf too! I do typically add some permissions for those sites for convenience, since librewolf is privacy/tracking hardened (firefox fork) out of the box. I use Teams and Outlook every day, and occasionally will drop a file into OneDrive or edit something in MS Office. I don’t write many office-format documents though, so I’m more likely to be in LibreOffice or a PDF viewer just reading a doc.

    You know how in media streaming and gaming there’s that balance of whether it is more convenient to be a paying customer versus pirate everything?

    Microsoft’s stuff is literally better to use in Linux. Even if I need to test the Windows build of something, a VM is SO much more convenient. And I’m not even logged into the microsoft shit on that. If I need something from OneDrive, I go to the browser there too.

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Employees arent the ones paying for Teams, so why would they care? Teams could openly market itself as remote work surveillance tool for employers and they’d gobble that shit up.