cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1135683/x-announces-significant-restrictions-to-free-accounts-50-posts-and-200-replies-per-day

  • Direct Messages (daily): The limit is 500 messages sent per day.
  • Posts: 50 original posts and 200 replies per day for unverified accounts. The daily update limit is further broken down into smaller limits for semi-hourly intervals.
  • Changes to account email: 4 per hour.
  • Following (daily): The technical follow limit is 400 per day. Please note that this is a technical account limit only, and there are additional rules prohibiting aggressive following behavior.
  • Following (account-based): Once an account is following 5,000 other accounts, additional follow attempts are limited by account-specific ratios.
    • terabyterex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      this is what it really is. this seems very normal but its happening on a service owned by a shitty person so people make a big deal. this isnt enshiyification, as another commenter said because it doesnt affect a normal user.

    • krisevol@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Most people won’t hit those numbers, and this that so should probably be paying for the service

  • OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Since 2007 or so, I haven’t seen a good use case for Xitter other than situations where mass messaging is necessary. Like a utility company announcing maintenance or outages. Why do people care so much about what other people think?

    My dear mother taught me that opinions are like assholes. Everybody has one and they all stink.

    Wise woman.

    • IronBird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      this saying doesnt apply universally, what about people into butt stuff that regularly bleach their assholes you tear into that after a good bleaching/shower (and enema, if you want to be safe), it’s fine

  • nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    The upside of Twitter’s downfall has been the absence of “look what so and so said in a tweet” headlines.

  • mechoman444@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m happy to say that the only time I’ve ever even been on twitter was to check down times on destiny 2 servers which at the time was literally the only place they’d post stuff like that… Nobody knows why… But then again it’s bungie… So…

  • Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is enshitification, but it might be indirectly helping people who are on Twitter too much 😄

    It doesn’t do much to bot farms since they can keep spinning up more accounts

      • Zagorath@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        Enshittification doesn’t mean “making a good system bad”. It’s a specific process whereby the user experience of a platform is degraded in order to benefit the business partners. Then even the business partners are ripped off to benefit the platform owners.

        • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          If you want to get picky, Xwitter didn’t enshitify as laid out as a concept by Cory Doctorow. The best example is probably Amazon which went from being insanely user friendly to lock in users, to supplier-friendly and increasingly less so for users, until it had squeezed and shafted both groups. That’s enshitification and it doesn’t apply to Xwitter. They had problems to make money before a certain somebody bought it. They’ve been bleeding users since the eventually Nazi saluting manbaby bought it, who then wanted to sue advertisers who refused to buy ads on his service. There was no user lock-in and then a supplier lock-in. There was just shit. All their current problems are man made. By one specific man.