224GB/s, killer security, no radio interference—but you can’t block the beam.

  • Candelestine@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean … that’s great for outer space. Not so much down here, except in pretty niche applications.

    I mean, you’re basically making a data lamp. Hold your phone up to it, get super fast wifi. That’s … niche at best, here on Earth. More refined VR eventually, I suppose?

    • eroc1990@lemmy.parastor.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Could also be useful for internal data transmission inside a chassis where, for whatever reason, a direct physical connection isn’t possible.

      EDIT: Spelling

      • BitSound@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, this could be great for clustered computing. I only did software for a supercomputer company a while back so maybe there’s reasons this wouldn’t work, but it seems pretty useful within a rack. It’d probably make people over at !cableporn@lemmy.world sad to see those cables go away though.

          • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            No wires for line of site. No digging, no runs, no fragile expensive tips, etc. That is if and when it stabilizes as a medium.

            • thevoyage@no.lastname.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              You then have a communication system that can be shut down by fog or heavy rain though.

              It’s slightly less stupid in interior applications, but data centre applications will almost always be better suited to wired.

        • feitingen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not really since then all computers share the same link and bandwidth, and latency will be very inconsistent with more than two computers since there will be crosstalk and retransmissions.

          With cheaper cables, each computers can max out the bandwidth of each cable, and get much lower latency since there’s no crosstalk.

          The only benefit is that you don’t have to run cables, everything else is worse.

    • MxM111@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      They use collimated lasers in space to reduce beam divergence. Distances in space are HUUUGE. A simple bulb or even LED does not cut it.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I could totally see outside-in VR using this. You already have to be in view of a lighthouse, so adding extra equipment to transfer data instead of using a cable would be nice. You’d then need to include a battery in the headset, but all in all it’d probably be better than a cable. Other than that, yeah. I don’t see a use for this for many consumer products.