Which text editor do you use?

  • ian@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 minutes ago

    I think it comes with a text editor already built in. I don’t need a text editor though.

  • nieminen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I use nano for simple text edits, anything more and I use sublime, or code.

    Used to develop c++ in emacs though, never got the benefit of VIM, super hard to use.

  • luciferofastora@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Linux has made great strides to being approachable for new users. The agony of choice for so many things (distro, editor, nearly any tool family with more than one option) and the factionalism around the options is probably one of the few big obstacles left.

    I don’t have a solution for the factionalism. I’d put forth a suggestion for a simple “standard” choice (Kate/gedit for GUI and nano for CLI; I personally use vim, but I think nano is more approachable) but I’m sure someone will disagree and we’re back to square one.

  • Digit@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It’s worse than the picture depicts. It’s not just the lovers, the elitists and the evangelists, it’s the sheer range of choice too, beyond the loudest.

    same cat surrounded by dozens of text editor courgettes that look like snakes

  • sumsinj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I use nvim/ vim just because i was new and didn’t know anything I could edit on an ssh connection with beside vim. And it isn’t that hard, using lazyvim atm (still new and dont have time to configure myself) and if I can just use the mouse if I am too stupid, not that hard. But it get more and more convenient as time goes on. You encounter enough times and just think to yourself “is there a better way?” and most of the time there is! Just start with “i”, “<Esc>” and “:wq”.

  • this@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    All I’m gonna say is than nano is installed on almost every Linux os and has the keyboard shortcuts written on the UI.

    • cockmushroom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Who doesn’t have vi/m?

      Fwiw, helix also gives visual feedback on bindings if a key is a table for mutiple bindings.

      • this@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I’m sorry I don’t see how that’s relevant to my point.

        I’m saying that of all the text editors, nano is the one that usually takes the least amount of effort to learn and set up. Both of those options require either learning or set up, so why would I choose them if convinience is what I’m after?

  • ragas@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I used to use nano.

    Since I learned how to exit vim, without murdering it, I use vim. Vim is mostly my choice becasue deleting and moving lines is incedibly fast and it has the very best code highlighting.