• ThatGuyFromWork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Actually an instance dedicated to self hosted stuff would be great. We could have communities specifically for things like home lab, media hosting (Plex, Jellyfin, Emby), unRAID, TrueNAS, shit posting, hardware discussions, general conversations, etc.

    This would reduce the strain on lemmy.world and give us all a dedicated home for more niche topics without posts getting buried

  • SomeOtherUsername@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    In terms of an optimal load spread, it’s best if the lemmiverse is split into multiple equally sized instances. If you use an instance just for yourself, it doesn’t actually decrease the load on the main servers in any way. The only thing you get is a guarantee that your instance won’t suddenly go down.

      • andreluis034@lm.put.tf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        What kind of “control” do you mean? Your posts/comments get replicated across all the other instances. You can’t really “guarantee” a delete, since the other instances might just ignore your request for delete.

        • ipkpjersi@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 year ago

          By control, I mean I can back up my data and ensure my comments, subscribed communities, messages, etc are all available to me no matter what, I don’t have to rely on some external third-party managing it for me.

        • ipkpjersi@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          My instance will be for me only, I will be the only person on it and it will be closed for registrations. I won’t be responsible for anyone else’s data on my instance, nothing for me to be concerned about.

          • RomanRoy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not really sure about that. I’m not saying it as an expert or anything, but that’s a discussion I saw around here the other day.

            Basically, once you federate and copy the content to your instance, it is in your server and you are responsible for it.

            I’ll agree with a few things, tho:

            It barely happens today, on centralized platforms. They’re hardly obliged to remove content because some judge says so (it does happen, tho, at least in my country)

            I’d imagine it would be a bit of a grey area legally, right now. We would need legislation regarding the fediverse. Imagine someone posts child porn in an instance yours is federated to. Your instance copies the content. You notice and defederated the whole instance, but don’t remove the content. The dude is banned by his home instance and his post is removed. But his copy still exists in yours, since you defederated before his ban and content removal.

            Just saying that selfhosting brings a lot of things that need to come to your attention.

            • ipkpjersi@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Does Lemmy automatically grab all content from all federated servers, or does it only grab the content from communities you (and any other users on the instance) are subscribed to/are actively being visited?

              I’m not so sure it does copy all content in the background.

              • obosob@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah, it’s only communities that people on your instance search for/subscribe to afaik. So if you’re the only one on your instance then you have control over that.

                Further to that it’s only the post objects (and comments, etc.) that is replicated all pics and videos are just URLs. even when you upload a picture with the post, that’s just uploaded to the instance and the link to it is the link of the post, even on other instances the images are fetched from the original source from the client side. I do believe each instance does local thumbnaling.

    • Admiral Patrick@dubvee.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you use an instance just for yourself, it doesn’t actually decrease the load on the main servers in any way.

      That’s not completely true. Yeah, it still loads another server a bit, but the server-to-server federation traffic is much more lightweight than the client-to-server traffic that would be involved with you having an account on that server and accessing it that way.

      But yeah, multiple, equally-sized communities on different instances is the ideal situation. The only sticky part right now is FOMO because you’d have to constantly watch for new SelfHosted communities and join them. Hopefully some frontend tools come along soon to make joining/managing multiple communities like that more streamlined.

      • Strive7307@discuss.tchncs.de
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, ideally you‘d want to have a few large communties on each instance and not all topics with a single userbase on one. This not only decreases the load but also prevents scenarios in which a single admin starts to capsule their instance with a large userbase away from the federation.

    • Wats0ns@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, but we’re currently evolving into a situation where everything is centralized around Lemmy.world

    • J_C___@lemmy.place
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Also the assurance that your home instance won’t be suddenly federated from one of the major ones

      • s4if@lemmy.my.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        As long as you don’t let your instance become bot/nazi/tanky swarm, you are green…

  • abraham_linksys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I laughed but I dunno about you guys but I don’t publicly self host anything. If you can’t auth via ssh or VPN then you’re not accessing a damn thing from my home network. I’ve got multiple routers that I could set up some isolation with but it’s just too close to home.

    • XTornado@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Me having everything open: Come here mother***s I am waiting for all of you.

      VPNs? Cloudfare? Cloudfare Tunnels? Tailscale? What’s all that? Here we are fighters not pus***s.

      (Just kidding about the previos comments haha, well I have it open but it’s not on my home network… so slightly less problematic and tbh I am planning on closing some stuff, plus all is behind logins, and tbh I kind of like to be able to access to it from anywhere/any computer without having to use any special connection)

      • kitrune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, now I’m worried about my security. I have an ngrok tunnel running inside a container on a raspberry pi. Do I need to worry about my other devices or if someone tries to attack me only the container is affected?

  • nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Considering how overloaded lemmy.world is right now, a pi in someone’s basement would be better, and besides, centralization is bad. Federation is what prevents lemmy from becoming the next Twitter.

  • LachlanUnchained@lemmyunchained.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m hosting one right now. Lemmyunchained.net

    But in will have to Limit Users at some point.

    I dont Think people properly understand they can be on any server. And join multiple communities. And it all Show up in their Feed. They don’t Need to worry about “which community has the Most Users”

    • Wats0ns@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes they can be on any instance, but I’m starting to get worried about the number of communities that are on Lemmy.world

        • MacFearrs@vlemmy.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It disregards the benefits of a distributed platform. Imagine if the admins went rouge, or the server data was irreversibly lost, suddenly all that content would be gone or under the authoritarian rule of the admins. Bit dramatic but you get the point.

          If the majority of content is on there, we’ve quite literally taken a decentralised system and centralised it lol

        • terribleplan@lemmy.nrd.li
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Communities are inherently tied to the instance on which they are created and cannot be moved. If the instance is overloaded then that community will not federate properly. If the instance goes down nobody can post to the community. If the instance goes away that community goes away (except for the “cache” that other instances have).

    • pyrojoe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Out of curiosity what has the disk usage growth looked like so far for your lemmy instance? I occasionally selfhost but I’m not a hardcore datahorder or anything so the replication of data from instances you subscribe to has me on the fence.

      • LachlanUnchained@lemmyunchained.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lady i checked, it was about 21g used from a 1tb ZFS pool.

        My instance isn’t minuscule though. Few months old and only 20 users. I’m curious about longer term growth though. No idea how long 1tb will last, but I have more of need be.

        (This is my little lab)

        • pyrojoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Damn that setup is no joke. 21GB in a few months initially sounded like a lot to me… but I decided to math it out. Lets say the 20gb was across 1,2 or 3 months…

          Time till 1tb would fill up.
          +------+-----------+----------+----------+
          |      | 3 months  | 2 months | 1 month  |
          | 1 TB | ~12 years | ~8 years | ~4 years |
          +------+-----------+----------+----------+
          

          That data usage is looking pretty reasonable… Even 20gb per month is something that wouldn’t be too hard to keep up with and I’m sure eventually there’ll be a way to clean up old posts that no one on your instance saved or commented on if you are trying to save space. I’d start to worry if disk usage was hitting closer to 40gb a month.

          • LachlanUnchained@lemmyunchained.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            i wish there was a way to show the growth over time, because obviously some is taken up by the OS, then all the initial setup of lemmy. I’ll keep an eye on it as it grows.

            • pyrojoe@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Grafana + something like influxdb+telegraf would do the trick. It sounds like you don’t have metric gathering like that on your instance? If that’s the case I’m surprised you don’t when you’re running with a full server rack haha.

    • 🦥󠀠󠀠󠀠󠀠󠀠󠀠@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      In practice right now it can be a bit schetchy tbh. Finding and subscribing to them is flakey and searching can be a bit hit and miss too.

      When it does all work both smoothly and seemlessly then we’ll be golden.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve seen something like 8 comments pointing people towards their own servers.

      Which essentially guarantees a level of community fragmentation as to prevent community growth, cohesive, or general activity does it not?

      Ideally each community “group” would have their own Lemmy instance.

    • KairuByte@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unless I am mistaken, when the instance you sign up with dies, so does your account? Obviously your content and potentially profile will exist in some state, but you would no longer be able to authenticate, so for all intents and purposes your account is gone.

      While that won’t matter for some, for others that means there is some importance in the decision of where you create your account. Since, once that instance decides to shut down (or if it happens to defederate,) your account goes with it.

  • terribleplan@lemmy.nrd.li
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah… it is kinda hypocritical for this community to be based on .world, haha. There are plenty of people here running instances, who wants to volunteer as tribute and to sign up to be on call?

    • PriorProject@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, it’s self-hosting, right. We each host our own server with our own self-hosting community. Alone. No other posters, commenters, or voters. Just each of us in isolation talking to ourselves about our hosting setup.

      This is a dumb meme, there’s no such thing as self-hosting a community. A community only becomes valuable when you share it beyond the hoster, at which point it stops being self-hosted for most community-members. I believe Ruud did actually create this community, which means it is properly self-hosted as much as a successful community can be.

      • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It is, but it’s also on a server that’s crippled by load. Each community having an instance makes sense as far as load goes.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve got business fiber, redundant networking, power, storage, and servers! With a bunch of compute sitting offline atm. Would be willing to give it a shot 🤔

      Needs monitoring though.

      • PriorProject@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Now it’s full of people who aren’t hosting it and it’s not self-hosted for them anymore.

        The idea of a self-hosted community is meaningless. It has to attract people other than the hoster to be useful.