• JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They don’t want to send us videos, they want to serve us ads and annoy us into buying Youtube Premium, which someone using adblocker won’t see, or need. From their point of view they would win either way - if they successfully block adblockers it either converts us into ad watchers, premium subscribers, or we fuck off and stop using their bandwidth.

    • no banana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s funny because I pay for premium and have noticed a worse experience since this was revealed. They don’t seem to check if a user has adblock and pays.

      • lastweakness@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        They don’t seem to check if a user has adblock and pays.

        They definitely seem to have checks in place for it. I have Family Premium and so far no issues at all.

        Edit: to clarify, not a fan of any of this. Just saying it does work for me

        • Malfeasant@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Well, I don’t pay for premium, and I use an adblocker, and I haven’t had any problems. Not having a problem doesn’t prove anything if they’re only targeting a subset of their users…

        • voidMainVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The article says that this isn’t happening for all users, which indicates that they’re still experimenting with it and haven’t fully rolled it out yet.