• ZeroCool@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    9 months ago

    Andy Yen says draft safety standards ‘would force online services … to access, collect and read users’ private conversations’

    What the hell Australia. This isn’t gonna magically help you prevent the next Emu war.

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      But it will help them in their corruption and self-enrichment, which is the entire purpose of all attempts to erode civil liberties.

    • x4740N@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Australia is a country with shit laws as someone who lives in Australia

      Life is fine unless you somehow manahe to break those stupid laws

      For example there was that video of the one guy from Australia who wanted to ban anime, yeah some of our politician’s are that stupid

      Thankfully anime isn’t banned completely but hentai is which I find stupid because it’s fictional drawings

      • wick@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Hentai is NOT banned here in Australia. As an Australian I’m sure you knew that and had some reason to lie. The freaks who import DVDs and manga from Japan depicting minors are getting targeted by immigration, but it isn’t a general ban. But who cares about them? If they are looking for something too fucked up to be on the internet it’s probably pedophilia. Also I want you to know that every time I hear someone bring up that hentai is fictional and above criticism I assume they are an actual child molester.

  • Geek_King@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    9 months ago

    I recently switched my email from gmail to proton mail, because fuck google’s… well… everything. Glad to hear that Proton Mail keeps fighting for privacy!

      • iamanoldguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Same, using Proton mail and I am now blissfully Google free. Something else I found the holidays good for is finding out all the old accounts I have floating out there from sites that I interacted with over the years so I can cancel them or change the email if i decide to keep them. But, no more Google! Next on my list is Amazon.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Proton’s feature set is very limited and development is incredibly slow, especially for Linux, but I do believe they’re committed to privacy and they do have a whole suite of products now under a single, very reasonably-priced subscription.

    • RanchOnPancakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I changed back when google got rid of the free “mail for your domain” and frankly its been a great thing for me. They keep announcing new things that replacing my existing apps.

      They have a password manager now that I use. They are finally adding actual fuction to their online drive storage so I can sync files and backup photos.

      Its been well worth the price for me. If only they had an office suite lol

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The eSafety regulator has stressed in an associated discussion paper it “does not advocate building in weaknesses or back doors to undermine privacy and security on end-to-end encrypted services”.

    But privacy and security groups argue the draft standards, as written, could allow the eSafety commissioner to force companies to compromise encryption to comply.

    Andy Yen, the founder and chief executive of Proton, told Guardian Australia the proposed standards “would force online services, no matter whether they are end-to-end encrypted or not, to access, collect, and read their users’ private conversations”.

    “These proposals could not only force companies to bypass their own encryption, but could put businesses and citizens at risk while doing little to protect people from the online harms they are intended to address,” he said.

    A spokesperson for the eSafety commissioner said Inman Grant welcomed feedback on the draft standards – including on the technical feasibility exception.

    “Having mandatory and enforceable codes in place, which put the onus back on industry to take meaningful action against the worst-of-the-worst content appearing on their products and services, is a tremendously important online safety milestone,” Inman Grant said.


    The original article contains 468 words, the summary contains 187 words. Saved 60%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      The eSafety regulator has stressed in an associated discussion paper it “does not advocate building in weaknesses or back doors to undermine privacy and security on end-to-end encrypted services”.

      Just straight up lying with that one.

    • x4740N@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Hey inman grant if you ever see this, fuck you

      We know your acting intentionally obtuse

  • s38b35M5@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    The eSafety commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, has proposed cloud and messaging service providers should detect and remove known child abuse material and pro-terror material “where technically feasible” – as well as disrupt and deter new material of that nature.

    The eSafety regulator has stressed in an associated discussion paper it “does not advocate building in weaknesses or back doors to undermine privacy and security on end-to-end encrypted services”.

    I so love these magic wand-waving legislators. “Spy on your users and control what they do on your encrypted platform, but in a way that doesn’t break encryption or violate privacy…”

  • dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    It’s worse then you think. As a Australian citizen you are required to comply with any order which includes leaking code and introducing back doors. Failure to comply or notifying your employer about the request will result in federal charges with a sentence between 20 to 60 years in prison. The legislation that contains this was passed almost a year ago.

    Recently there’s been a wave of mass disruptions and data theft in Australia including most of our ports halting operations for a day and one of our largest phone and internet service providers being compromised where millions of peoples personal information like driver licences and passports being leaked.