Starting August 7th, advertisers that haven’t reached certain spending thresholds will lose their official brand account verification. According to emails obtained by the WSJ, brands need to have spent at least $1,000 on ads within the prior 30 days or $6,000 in the previous 180 days to retain the gold checkmark identifying that the account belongs to a verified brand.

Threatening to remove verified checkmarks is a risky move given how many ‘Twitter alternative’ services like Threads and Bluesky are cropping up and how willing consumers appear to be to jump ship, with Threads rocketing to 100 million registrations in just five days. That said, it’s not like other efforts to drum up some additional cash, like increasing API pricing, have gone down especially well, either. It’s a bold strategy, Cotton — let’s see if it pays off for him.

  • Lightor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Wait, wait, wait, lemme get this right.

    Problem: They were low or revenue.

    Response: Increase API costs

    Problem: API costs are too high

    Response: People started scrapping Twitter

    Problem: People are scrapping the site

    Response: Make users sign in to view tweets

    Problem: People have to sign in to see any ads too

    Response: Tell companies that if they don’t spend enough on ads they will lose verification.

    I mean, what’s next?

      • ComeHereOrIHookYou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Problem: Decrease of Twitter Blue subscribers

        Solution: Sue every other competitor for alleged infringing Twitter’s trade secrets

        • SuperDuper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          11 months ago

          Problem: the Twitter brand is the only part of the company that still has any value

          Solution: throw it in the trash and replace with with the letter X, otherwise known as the most overused letter in marketing/branding, otherwise known as the most useless letter from an SEO standpoint

        • WarmSoda@lemm.ee
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          He even sued the attorneys for twitters previous board members because they sold the company to him.

          I don’t know how that one slipped under the radar.

      • Mdotaut801@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I mean I would but they’re all getting recalled :(. Jk. I’d never buy one of those shit boxes.