• Eggyhead@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maybe with less actual people involved, governments will be less opposed to scaling back the egregious level of surveillance such corporations are allowed.

    Who am I kidding, though?

    • Gorgritch_Umie_Killa@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I could see that happening, its probably what holds a lot of States and Countys back.

      A lot of States are happy not to have a large corporations tax, because they get their share through another means, say income, or land tax. Which they charge employed persons, if a company doesn’t employ many people, then they will be less value to a State like that.