• MeanEYE@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    9 months ago

    IRC is sadly going away slowly. Which is a shame, it’s a great protocol that is easy to implement and simple to work with. Biggest problem I see is its inability to embed images and other multimedia. Had that been the case protocol would live on I feel. We just needed few more channel modes, some that ban or allow specific multimedia and inline image support and we are good.

    Some people, if not most who use IRC, would claim otherwise, but there’s a reason why Slack became popular even though it’s shitty electron application.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      There are multiple IRC clients that render inline images just fine and also some very nice web clients that allow posting such images directly from the app.

      The main problem of IRC is IMHO that the large networks refuse to implement most of the newer IRCv3 standards or alternatively provide multi-client bouncers to their users.

      • einlander@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Adiirc has an option to do inline images. The client pulls the image in on its own. Makes it look similar to Discord.

      • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        IRCv3 doesn’t bring multimedia as far as I know. There are good changes to the protocol proposed, but they are moving too slow.

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          This would require an HTML image upload service, which is out of scope for IRCv3 protocol specs.

          But nothing stops a server implementation from providing this, and as already said several client+bouncer combinations already support media uploads very well.

          The slow moving isn’t the problem of the IRCv3 specs, the issue is the adoption by the large networks and subsequently the clients (which rarely implement features the vast majority of their users on the large networks can’t use).

    • Doubletwist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      Biggest problem I see is its inability to embed images and other multimedia.

      That’s one of its best features as far as I’m concerned, and one of the reasons I still use it every day.

    • Political Custard@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      I like to think that the last sound ever to be heard on the internet will be someone getting slapped with a wet trout.

      What a magical world irc was in the 90s when I was a gay closeted teenager talking to queers from all over the world. When you find your people for the first time. IRC will always hold a special place in my heart. I always keep an irc client on my install… for old time’s sake.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I wonder if multiple IRC clients all agreed at the same time to extend the protocol by rendering markdown in the messages if that would help.

      • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        There’s a “new” draft for version 3 being worked on but to be honest they are not addressing in my opinion the right features. Yay, we are going to get unicode nicknames? I think people are fine with what is there now. But not being able to paste code or images, now that’s a real hindrance.