• Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Windows 7.

    It was the peak of windows.

    It was slick. It was fast. It was stable, and it was super easy to use. Never had a single problem with it, and unlike past windows OS’s it didnt require regular reformats to clean house for stability.

    Unfortunately its dead now, and Microsoft abandoned that approach and switched to a slow burn approach at walled gardening.

    I use Linux now, have been for years, because I saw where microsoft was going when Win10 was in previews, and there was no way I was going to be part of it… So I jumped ship as soon as EoL was announced for Win 7

    • glue_snorter@lemmy.sdfeu.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Launch by hitting windows key and start typing (this is now a bullshit web search)

      The taskbar was usable (fuck this app grouping)

      Virtual desktops

      Fast

      Stable

      Looked fine

      Hit F8 for recovery options on boot

      System rollback

  • YIj54yALOJxEsY20eU@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Debian 12 just overtook Fedora for me after the Red Hat debauchery. With podman/distrobox/qemu/flatpak installed I really don’t need my base OS to constantly be the latest and greatest. And I sure love that debian is community run and has taken the step to include non free software.

    • heimchen@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yea, went the other way to OpenSuse Leap and have a tumbleweed, Fedora and arch distrobox. Distrobox is such a helpful tool.

  • darcy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as Linux, is in fact, GNU/Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU plus Linux. Linux is not an operating system unto itself, but rather another free component of a fully functioning GNU system made useful by the GNU corelibs, shell utilities and vital system components comprising a full OS as defined by POSIX. Many computer users run a modified version of the GNU system every day, without realizing it. Through a peculiar turn of events, the version of GNU which is widely used today is often called Linux, and many of its users are not aware that it is basically the GNU system, developed by the GNU Project. There really is a Linux, and these people are using it, but it is just a part of the system they use. Linux is the kernel: the program in the system that allocates the machine’s resources to the other programs that you run. The kernel is an essential part of an operating system, but useless by itself; it can only function in the context of a complete operating system. Linux is normally used in combination with the GNU operating system: the whole system is basically GNU with Linux added, or GNU/Linux. All the so-called Linux distributions are really distributions of GNU/Linux!

    • OwenEverbinde@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t stop there. I like to give the FULL name of my operating system when I use it. Example:

      “What distro are you running?”

      “Oh on this laptop here? This laptop is running Mint, daughter of Ubuntu, son of Debian, daughter of Linux, son of GNU! Her ancestors hail from the mountains of Copyleft, where the mighty Stallman wields his hammer Emacs to forge her people’s legendary tools!”

      Anything shorter is just disrespectful.

    • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      My 2nd favorite pasta, only topped by

      Own a musket for home defense, since that's what the founding fathers intended. Four ruffians break into my house. "What the devil?" As I grab my powdered wig and Kentucky rifle. Blow a golf ball sized hole through the first man, he's dead on the spot. Draw my pistol on the second man, miss him entirely because it's smoothbore and nails the neighbors dog. I have to resort to the cannon mounted at the top of the stairs loaded with grape shot, "Tally ho lads" the grape shot shreds two men in the blast, the sound and extra shrapnel set off car alarms. Fix bayonet and charge the last terrified rapscallion. He Bleeds out waiting on the police to arrive since triangular bayonet wounds are impossible to stitch up. Just as the founding fathers intended.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Linux of course. I don’t invite Apple or Microsoft into my computer. Apple has good hardware though so I can understand using a mac.

  • redballooon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mac OS. People say it costs more, but I am not paying for a hardware and then some software that tries to make use of it. Instead I’m paying for a well thought out product that just works.

    • DJDarren@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      that (mostly) just works.

      FTFY

      As a Mac user since 2007 it feels like that statement gets a little less true every couple of years. But for me it’s still light years ahead of Windows when it comes to my workflow.

  • argv_minus_one@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Windows 95 and Debian were my “holy crap this is cool” operating systems as a kid.

    Windows slowly went to hell over the years, and Debian didn’t, so now I mostly use Debian.

  • viridian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Will I get jumped if I say MacOS?

    I’m just kidding, but I do like MacOS. I just find it more aesthetically pleasing than Windows and I find it easier to use and longer lasting than Windows. Like, I had to use my 2014 MacBook Air with 4GB of RAM for a week because I needed to repair my main Mac. Yes, it was slow, I couldn’t have too many apps running at the same time, and I couldn’t have my customary 20 tabs open, but it was certainly usable and not too frustrating.

  • Evkob@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use EndeavourOS. I like pacman and AUR, as well as the fact that Arch-based distros are well-supported by most software. I’m too much of a noob/too lazy to setup an OS without a GUI installer though, which is why I prefer Endeavour over Arch.

  • Zeusbottom@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Love how most of the responses are different distros of Linux.

    1998:

    Me: I’d rather be running Linux

    Systems Manager: Linux is a day late and a dollar short. Novell is the future. Microsoft might be interesting too.

    She went off to teach community college after she got laid off.

  • doggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Arch Linux

    So that I can brag about using Arch Linux.

    Seriously though, I wanted to learn about Linux and chose trial-by-fire. I’ve used other (Debian based) distros but pacman + the Arch user repository are hard to live without now.

    Though if I ever had to reinstall I’d probably save myself some headache and install EndeavorOS.

  • Jocarnail@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Right now, macOS. Switched to it when I started uni and I’m never going back to Windows. The main reasons are:

    • unix based
    • generally easier to manage software
    • the OS itself has most of the basic utilities already packed in and most of them with the right features. I rarely felt the need to install new software to cover lacking parts.

    Also, generally stuff is packed fairly well, with care for user experience.

    I will say, I’m dipping my feets in linux as well, and it looks like a lot of distro now are mature and accessible. If I ever were to buy a second pc I would seriously consider the penguin.

    • catfish@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      FWIW I’ve been a continuous Linux user for 30 years and prefer macOS as my “daily driver”.

      Always have a Linux server running though, so in a way I could be described as 50/50 I suppose.