Awesome! I started running too… up to 4.5 km 3 times a week

castle in the night… and my back is still ok fortunatelly

that was always a transparent excuse… only a total rube would believe that was a legitimate reason to sell guns like popcorn in a theatre

Exactly this

same

I honestly think there are a lot more people similar to you than you may suspect

This is what “blind to privilege” means… LOL

But we ain’t there yet.

Sorry but this line is how the USA fell off the wagon in the first place

nd not only that, you got there on Jan 6

Good… now repeat it but as a General Strike

You’re moving the goalposts. You said you need nuance in how to measure a shirt size, you’re arguing just to argue.

I said I needed context to verify AI was not giving me slop. If you want to trust AI blindly, go ahead, I’m not sure why you need me to validate your point

If a model ever starts answering these curiosities inaccurately, it would be an insufficient model for that task and wouldn’t be used for it.

And how would you notice unless: you either already know the correct answer (at least a ballpark) or verify what AI is telling you?

You would immediately notice this is a bad model when it tells you to measure your neck to get a sleeve length

What if it gives you and answer that does not sound so obviously wrong? like measuring the neck width instead of circumference? or measure shoulder to wrists?

So I’m making the assertion that many models today are already sufficient for accurately answering daily curiosities about modern life.

And once again I tell you that you can trust it blindly while I would not and I will add that I do not need another catalyst for the destruction of our planet so I can get some trivia questions answered. Given the environmental cost of AI, I would expect a significant return, not just a trivia machine that may wrong 25% of the time

but to dismiss their utility completely is just idiotic.

not what I said at all. I simply stated AI answers cannot be trusted without verifying them which makes them a lot less useful

not at the current cost or environmental damage

I second this motion

The last thing I googled is how to measure dress shirt size. Do you need context and nuance for everything you Google?

if AI is answering, yes.

Do you prefer to click on the seo optimized first page results that are full of ads and read through a nonsense article…

No, but that’s not what i claimed so you can have your strawman back

Most of the Internet is NOT intellectual writing, it’s blog spam to answer your daily curiosities and practical needs. A sufficienty trained model is a really good (and environmentally friendly) alternative.

Let me know when we get one. In the meantime, enjoy your thick, glue riddled, pizza sauce

…and it’s only expensive and ruins the environment even faster than our wildest nightmares

what you say is true but it’s not a viable business model, which is why AI has been overhyped so much

This is the way… even better, have no Meta accounts of any kind

We are anxiety twinsies then

I see… and agree. In my world PornHub seems to be the most famous but I rarely visit.

Seeing some “unexplored” options with all the suggestions here hehehe

people still on twitter are complete, brain washed idiots… so this behaviour tracks

why would you read a whole article to answer a simple question when AI gives you the answer directly?

context?, nuance?, verifying the AI slop?